Table 4. Comparison of different EPG waveform feeding patterns of BPH on different rice varieties for 5 h (8–12 h) (percentage duration and standard error).

	N	NP	Pathway	N4-a	N4-b	N5	N6	N7
Azuceana	7	1.2e(±1.0)	5.7c (±4.1)	0.5 (±0.5)	92.5a (±5.1)	0.0c (±0.0)	0.0c (±0.0)	0.1ef (±0.1)
Nipponbare	8	6.4de (±5.5)	17.2bc (±8.0)	7.4 (±4.1)	67.9a (±14.2)	0.9bc (±0.6)	0.0c (±0.0)	0.2def (±0.1)
TN1	9	1.1e (±0.9)	13.2bc (±8.4)	11.9 (±5.5)	73.8a (±8.1)	0.0c (±0.0)	0.0c (±0.0)	0.0f (±0.0)
IR694	10	11.7cde (±8.3)	17.2bc (±6.5)	8.5 (±5.7)	58.6ab (±11.7)	3.8ab (±1.8)	0.0bc (±0.0)	0.2def (±0.1)
Fujisaka	11	13.7bcd (±4.5)	32.0abc (±8.4)	17.2 (±7.9)	32.8bcd(±14.2)	3.1abc (±1.2)	0.3bc (±0.2)	0.9abcd (±0.3)
IR758	10	20.3bcd (±10.5)	31.8abc (±11.0)	11.2 (±7.4)	32.5bc (±14.8)	2.8ab (±1.3)	0.7bc (±0.6)	0.8bcde (±0.4)
MR232	10	18.3cd (±9.9)	40.5ab (±11.5)	2.9 (±1.9)	34.5bc (±14.2)	1.5abc (±0.7)	0.4bc (±0.4)	1.9abcd (±0.8)
MR219	10	23.2abc (±7.2)	39.9ab (±9.0)	1.9 (±1.2)	26.1cde (±13.4)	4.4ab (±1.4)	3.1a (±1.0)	1.4ab (±0.4)
IR64	12	22.1abc (±9.1)	54.9a (±9.3)	5.3 (±1.8)	11.4 cde (±7.6)	4.1ab (±1.1)	0.6b (±0.3)	1.6a (±0.3)
Rathu	8	29.5ab (±10.6)	57.2a (±9.3)	6.3 (±5.3)	0.0e (±0.0)	4.5a (±1.3)	0.0c (±0.0)	2.5ab (±1.5)
Babawee	10	45.2a (±12.1)	45.5ab (±10.9)	2.1 (±0.9)	0.0e (±0.0)	5.6ab (±2.5)	0.1bc (±0.1)	1.5ab (±0.3)
F1	15	34.2ab (±8.6)	56.6a (±7.6)	4.2 (±1.7)	0.2de (±0.2)	3.9ab (±0.8)	0.1bc (±0.1)	0.9abc (±0.2)
Average		19.9** (±3.8)	34.3** (±5.2)	6.6ns (±1.4)	35.9** (±9.0)	2.9** (±0.5)	0.4** (±0.3)	1.0** (±0.2)
Chi-square		42.22	30.56	9.47	57.14	37.76	28.47	38.05
Pr>Chi-square (Kruskal- Wallis P value)		<.0001	0.0013	0.5787	<.0001	<.0001	0.0027	<.0001

Means± SE within columns followed by the same letters are not significantly different (P>0.05, Kruskal- Wallis and Duncan test).

** =  Significant at 1% probability level; ns  =  Non-significant.