Table 1.
Results of Bayes factor comparisons of strict-clock versus non-clock models for various character subsets of the Dibamids-only dataset. (Interpretation based on recommendations of Kass & Raftery [37].)
| partition | Bayes factor | interpretation | Bayes PPa |
|---|---|---|---|
| all positions | 53.52 | very strongly non-clock | 1.0 |
| nuclear only | 85.28 | very strongly non-clock | 1.0 |
| ND2 | −4.72 | moderately favours clock | 1.0 |
| BDNF | −1.94 | weakly favours clock | 0.99 |
| CMOS | −2.84 | moderately favours clock | 0.65 |
| DNAH3 | −5.86 | moderately favours clock | 0.98 |
| NKTR | −8.1 | strongly favours clock | 1.0 |
| R35 | 3.96 | moderately favours non-clock | 1.0 |
| RAG1 | −0.9 | weakly favours clock | 1.0 |
aPosterior probabilities of the Anelytropsis/mainland Dibamus clade recovered in all strict-clock analyses.