Table 3.

Comparison of ADR in the current study and those reported in the literature

Overall ADR air method	36%	Current report
Overall ADR water method	40%
Overall ADR water with indigo carmine method (intent-to-treat without poor bowel prep exclusion)	62%
Representative published overall ADR	ADR	Literature Reference
Narrow band imaging	23%	27
High definition colonoscopes	24.7%	23
Withdrawal time >6 min	28.3%	32
High definition colonoscopes	28.8%	22
Chromoendoscopy and standard colonoscope (after excluding 4% with poor bowel preparation)	33.6% [29.6%]	35
Chromoendoscopy and standard colonoscope (after excluding 5% with poor bowel preparation)	35.4% [30.4%]	36
High resolution colonoscope	42	13
White light and high definition colonoscope	41–57%	15
Narrow band imaging	51%	24
Chromoendoscopy and high definition colonoscope (after excluding 9% with poor bowel preparation)	55.5% [46.5%]	15
Narrow band imaging	57.3%	28
White light	58.3%	28
High definition colonoscope	60.4%	21
Chromoendoscopy (after excluding 8% with poor bowel preparation)	66.2% [58.2%]	37

Values in [ ] indicate results based on intent-to-treat analysis without excluding the patients with suboptimal bowel preparation.