Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 2;27(15):2031–2037. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr319

Table 5.

Comparison of sequence coverage and assembly error rates in assembly of paired-end reads with various GC contents and depths of coverage (BCER=0.6%)

RL (bp) Seq (GC%) DC SS Eu Ve AB SO
SC (%) 35 D.mel (36.90) 30× 77.05 71.12 78.75 79.53 78.85
50× 79.16 71.98 79.03 79.65 78.52
70× 79.11 70.61 78.95 79.71 78.92
T.bru (44.38) 30× 72.69 71.07 71.37 73.46 70.07
50× 72.50 71.67 71.50 73.11 70.34
70× 73.59 69.08 71.32 73.27 70.78
75 D.mel (36.90) 30× 79.77 71.31 79.18 81.00 80.20
50× 79.88 70.17 78.79 80.82 80.36
70× 79.73 69.54 78.43 81.59 79.69
T.bru (44.38) 30× 77.19 71.56 76.52 81.97 76.25
50× 78.29 70.12 76.66 81.97 76.54
70× 78.49 70.86 78.17 81.10 76.55
AER (%) 35 D.mel (36.90) 30× 0.33 0.54 0.17 0.14 0.28
50× 0.32 0.52 0.19 0.16 0.29
70× 0.34 0.44 0.21 0.19 0.33
T.bru (44.38) 30× 0.30 1.30 0.25 0.19 0.21
50× 0.34 0.87 0.22 0.17 0.23
70× 0.40 0.73 0.21 0.21 0.20
75 D.mel (36.90) 30× 0.47 0.37 0.27 0.13 0.35
50× 0.41 0.48 0.21 0.14 0.42
70× 0.62 0.38 0.23 0.16 0.35
T.bru (44.38) 30× 0.52 0.79 0.55 0.45 0.39
50× 0.52 0.61 0.57 0.39 0.43
70× 0.61 0.72 0.61 0.42 0.42