Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 11;27(15):2076–2082. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr350

Table 2.

The contribution of individual terms to the alignment accuracy for Prosup and SALIGN benchmarks

Prosup (%)
SALIGN Prosup (%)
SALIGN
Method 1–1a ≤4b 1–1c (%) Method 1–1a ≤4b 1–1c (%)
PSSMd 63.4 80.5 59.1 SP−Xe 72.7 90.1 65.9
+SSf 68.4 87.1 62.9 SSg 72.4 88.7 64.7
+ϕ/ψf 68.7 85.5 61.7 −ϕ/ψg 72.3 90.2 65.5
+ASAf 70.2 86.7 63.9 ASAg 69.3 86.3 62.1

aOne-to-one match given by the method and Prosup.

bWithin four residues by the method and Prosup.

cOne-to-one match given by the method and TMalign.

dUsing PSSM matrix from PSIBLAST only.

eSP-X: SPARKS-X.

fUsing PSSM plus secondary structure, or ϕ/ψ, or ASA as noted.

gExcluding secondary structure, or ϕ/ψ, or ASA as noted.