Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2011 Aug;49(8):780–785. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821b3604

Table 4.

Diabetes performance for patients assigned under each method, and concordantly and discordantly assigned patients

Discordantly Assigned
Patients
Characteristic Plurality
Provider
Algorithm
(n=4,859)
% (n)
Diabetes
Care Home
(n=3,558)
% (n)
Concordantly
Assigned
Patients
(n=3,293)
% (n)
Plurality
Provider
Algorithm
Only
(n=1,566)
% (n)
Diabetes
Care Home
Only
(n=265)
% (n)
Differences
Between
Discordantly
Assigned
Patients
p-value
≥ 2 HbA1c tests anywhere in 2004 58.4 (2,838) 67.2 (2,392) 67.3 (2,216) 39.7 (622) 66.4 (176) <.001
≥ 1 LDL test anywhere in 2004 65.0 (3,157) 69.7 (2,480) 69.3 (2,282) 55.9 (875) 74.7 (198) <.001
Receipt of an eye exam in 2004 37.4 (1,817) 38.4 (1,366) 38.0 (1,251) 36.1 (566) 43.4 (115) 0.02

Abbreviations: HbA1c = Hemoglobin A1c; LDL = Low-density lipoprotein; PGP = Physician group practice