Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 20;2011:862121. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep145

Table 3.

Heart rate variability of the two study groups by mixed model.

Variables Control (n = 20) Experimental (n = 20) P-value
HR (bpm)
  Baseline 76.15 ± 11.71 75.95 ± 9.46 .093
  4th week 75.20 ± 11.46 71.70 ± 10.00 .399
  8th week 78.65 ± 12.17 71.30 ± 7.54 .060
  12th week 75.75 ± 7.95 71.20 ± 7.14 .331
SDNN (ms)
  Baseline 27.74 ± 12.63 28.95 ± 11.04 .609
  4th week 25.29 ± 12.32 42.51 ± 21.62 .024*
  8th week 25.40 ± 13.25 37.47 ± 12.90 .029*
  12th week 24.93 ± 12.75 37.84 ± 13.11 .105
RMSSD (ms)
  Baseline 28.44 ± 16.40 22.94 ± 17.02 .079
  4th week 32.83 ± 24.97 19.48 ± 11.81 .082
  8th week 27.68 ± 15.69 20.40 ± 16.21 .125
  12th week 26.16 ± 11.84 20.61 ± 13.33 .629
Total power (ms2)
  Baseline 591.67 ± 479.69 830.37 ± 773.41 .225
  4th week 589.58 ± 766.77 1837.12 ± 2060.79 .049*
  8th week 608.76 ± 761.64 1160.05 ± 866.09 .066
  12th week 553.31 ± 610.40 1272.76 ± 1126.29 .158
LF (ms2)
  Baseline 177.61 ± 205.10 244.26 ± 270.26 .409
  4th week 186.34 ± 434.22 498.67 ± 522.62 .130
  8th week 157.74 ± 244.64 346.60 ± 336.71 .114
  12th week 162.73 ± 233.30 433.18 ± 533.66 .360
HF (ms2)
  Baseline 161.50 ± 229.62 185.87 ± 265.58 .643
  4th week 113.33 ± 159.14 266.32 ± 383.74 .152
  8th week 150.99 ± 232.14 183.19 ± 161.47 .420
  12th week 127.57 ± 157.84 161.13 ± 120.27 .980
LF nu
  Baseline 52.76 ± 25.30 57.22 ± 20.96 .285
  4th week 64.04 ± 16.35 54.35 ± 16.58 .441
  8th week 61.84 ± 18.12 55.28 ± 16.56 .902
  12th week 61.94 ± 18.93 54.94 ± 16.24 .725
HF nu
  Baseline 47.24 ± 25.30 42.78 ± 20.96 .285
  4th week 35.96 ± 16.35 45.65 ± 16.58 .441
  8th week 38.16 ± 18.12 44.72 ± 19.75 .902
  12th week 38.06 ± 19.83 45.06 ± 16.24 .725
LF/HF ratio
  Baseline 2.24 ± 2.36 2.47 ± 3.31 .541
  4th week 1.56 ± 1.18 3.06 ± 3.70 .299
  8th week 1.99 ± 2.37 2.62 ± 2.94 .644
  12th week 1.50 ± 0.87 2.60 ± 2.37 .345

HR, heart rate; SDNN, standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR intervals; RMSSD, the square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals; LF, low frequency; HF, high frequency; LF nu, LF in normalized unit; HF nu, HF in normalized unit; Data were presented as mean ± SD. Work, occupation and working stress were adjusted. Bonferroni correction with adjusted α-level (α′ = 0.05/3 = 0.0167) was used for multiple comparisons between each time point and the baseline.

*Significantly different between two groups, P < .05; Significantly different between the present time point and the baseline, P < .0167.