Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 2;2011:282845. doi: 10.4061/2011/282845

Table 2.

Comparison of nonimaging modalities in the detection of intracranial stenosis.

Modality Degree of stenosis Sensitivity Specificity Limitations
Digital subtraction angiography Invasive test: Procedure risk rate: 0.3% for all complications, 0.03% for stroke [56]

MRA (TOF) [54] for ICA disease 50%–69% 37.9% 92.1% Limited spatial resolution, flow signal intensity loss as a result of saturation or phase dispersion, susceptibility artifacts near sphenoid sinus, and over- and underestimation of stenosis due to dephasing artifacts
>70%–99% 91.2% 88.3%
ICA occlusion 94.5% 99.3%
MRA (TOF) 3T [57] 50%–99% stenosis 78%–85% 95%
Occlusion 100% 99%

MRA (CE) [54] 50%–69% 65.9% 93.5%
>70%–99% 94.6% 91.9%
ICA occlusion 99.4% 99.6%

CTA* [59] Stenosis 98% 99%
Occlusion 100% 100%

Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound [62] >50% stenosis or occlusion High level of technical and procedural skill is required to obtain the best quality images. Reliable insonation of the posterior circulation is particularly difficult
For MCA stem (M1) 90%–99% 90%–99%
For intracranial segment (V4) of vertebral and basilar artery 70%–80% 90%–99%

CDDI [61] Atheromatous pseudo-occlusion
Unenhanced 70% 92% False negative rate 30%
Echo-enhanced PFI 83% 92% False negative rate 17%
Unenhanced 95% 92% False negative rate 5%
Echo-enhanced 94% 100% False negative rate 6%

CDDI: Color Doppler-assisted duplex imaging, PFI: power-flow imaging.

*Data are percentages using DSA as the reference standard.

North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria were used for stenosis calculations: [(DnDs)/Dn] × 100, where Dn is normal diameter and Ds is stenosed diameter. NASCET stenoses were grouped according to the following grading scale: normal (0%–9%), mild (10%–29%), moderate (30%–69%), severe (70%–99%), or occluded (no flow detected). Normal (0%–9%) and mild (10%–29%) stenosis were not considered diseased vessel segments and were excluded from analysis.

Ultrasound emission energy and gain cannot be increased high enough without the appearance of disturbing acoustic noise that diminishes the reliable depiction of orthograde flow signals.