Table 2.
Performance comparison of COSINE and with three other methods
| Set | Best λ for COSINE | Size of selected sub-network |
Recall |
Precision |
F-measure |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSINE | jAM | Local | COSINE | jAM | Local | COSINE | jAM | Local | COSINE | jAM | Local | ||
| 1 | 0.17 | 58 | 419 | 51 | 0.12 | 0.9 | 0.12 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.12 |
| 2 | 0.987 | 57 | 417 | 63 | 0.98 | 1 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 0.92 | 0.21 | 0.73 |
| 3 | 0.0009 | 13 | 385 | 51 | 0.24 | 0.98 | 0.7 | 0.92 | 0.13 | 0.69 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.994 | 95 | 421 | 75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.59 | 0.18 | 0.05 |
| 5 | 0.973 | 75 | 400 | 44 | 0.92 | 1 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.125 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.22 | 0.79 |
| 6 | 0.0005 | 25 | 417 | 52 | 0.55 | 0.9 | 0.65 | 0.88 | 0.086 | 0.5 | 0.68 | 0.16 | 0.57 |
Edge: the method of Guo et al. (2007); Local: the method of Wang and Xia (2008).