Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 16;27(9):1290–1298. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr136

Table 2.

Performance comparison of COSINE and with three other methods

Set Best λ for COSINE Size of selected sub-network
Recall
Precision
F-measure
COSINE jAM Local COSINE jAM Local COSINE jAM Local COSINE jAM Local
1 0.17 58 419 51 0.12 0.9 0.12 0.1 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.19 0.12
2 0.987 57 417 63 0.98 1 0.82 0.86 0.12 0.65 0.92 0.21 0.73
3 0.0009 13 385 51 0.24 0.98 0.7 0.92 0.13 0.69 0.38 0.23 0.69
4 0.994 95 421 75 0.86 0.86 0.06 0.45 0.1 0.04 0.59 0.18 0.05
5 0.973 75 400 44 0.92 1 0.74 0.61 0.125 0.84 0.74 0.22 0.79
6 0.0005 25 417 52 0.55 0.9 0.65 0.88 0.086 0.5 0.68 0.16 0.57

Edge: the method of Guo et al. (2007); Local: the method of Wang and Xia (2008).