Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 15;93(2):243–252. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.003871

TABLE 4.

Effects of treatment on measures of endothelial function (n = 26)1

EPA+DHA
P value2
0 g/d 0.85 g/d 3.4 g/d For treatment effect For period effect
Reactive hyperemia outcomes from FMD
 FMD (% change in artery diameter) 5.00 ± 0.48 4.03 ± 0.48 4.14 ± 0.48 0.11 0.73
 ΔArtery diameter (mm, peak-base) 0.24 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.02 0.07 0.80
 Peak flow:resting flow3 6.28 ± 0.44 6.59 ± 0.45 6.84 ± 0.44 0.55 0.001
RHI from EndoPAT
 RHI 1.84 ± 0.10 1.82 ± 0.10 1.86 ± 0.10 0.86 0.02
 Framingham RHI 0.28 ± 0.06 0.27 ± 0.07 0.33 ± 0.07 0.66 0.17
Pulse wave properties and HR from EndoPAT
 AI −9.33 ± 1.6 −9.52 ± 1.6 −9.25 ± 1.6 0.97 0.56
 AI standardized for HR of 75 bpm −16.9 ± 1.6 −17.5 ± 1.5 −18.1 ± 1.5 0.53 0.91
 Heart rate (beats/min)4 62.9 ± 1.6 62.7 ± 1.6 61.0 ± 1.6 0.09 0.03
Resting artery diameter and blood flow values (Doppler ultrasound)
 Artery diameter (mm)5 4.83 ± 0.13 4.92 ± 0.13 4.87 ± 0.13 0.09 0.005
 Velocity time integral (m)5 0.17 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.01 0.88 0.003
 Maximum velocity (m/s) 0.98 ± 0.06 0.95 ± 0.06 1.00 ± 0.06 0.49 0.10
 Average flow velocity (m/s)5 0.19 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.02 0.84 0.01
 Flow (mL/min)5 201 ± 17.5 207 ± 17.7 206 ± 17.5 0.94 0.0007
Postocclusion artery diameter and blood flow values (Doppler ultrasound)
 Artery diameter (mm)5 5.07 ± 0.13 5.10 ± 0.13 5.06 ± 0.13 0.55 0.01
 Velocity time integral (m) 0.97 ± 0.05 0.99 ± 0.05 1.02 ± 0.05 0.45 0.43
 Maximum velocity (m/s) 1.76 ± 0.07 1.76 ± 0.07 1.78 ± 0.07 0.83 0.22
 Average flow velocity (m/s) 1.02 ± 0.04 1.01 ± 0.04 1.02 ± 0.04 0.83 0.57
 Flow (mL/min) 1193 ± 77 1219 ± 77 1238 ± 77 0.68 0.47
1

Values are expressed as means ± SEMs. EndoPAT, Itamar Medical Ltd, Caesarea, Israel. RHI, Reactive Hyperemia Index; AI, Augmentation Index; HR, heart rate; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid.

2

P values are for the main effect of treatment and period based on the MIXED procedure with both fixed effects in the model when period effects were significant (version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). When the period was nonsignificant, it was removed from the model to determine treatment effects. None of the Tukey-adjusted P values for pairwise comparisons for treatment effects were significant (P > 0.05).

3

First-visit values were significantly greater than visit 2 and visit 3 values (P < 0.005, Tukey-adjusted).

4

First-visit values were significantly lower than visit 3 values (P = 0.04, Tukey-adjusted).

5

First-visit values were significantly lower than visit 2 and visit 3 values (P < 0.05, Tukey-adjusted).