Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 10;21(8):1747–1760. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq241

Table 5.

ANOVA statistics for network connectivity analyses

Networks df F MSE Follow-up analyses
Syntactic complexity × capacity Correlation: WM capacity and (complex–simple)
    Control (within) 1, 24 4.28 0.036     r = 0.44**
    Control-LH language 1, 24 4.39 0.037     r = 0.44**
Load × syntactic complexity Complex–simple in 3 WM Load Conditions
    LH language–memory 2, 23 3.45 0.022     t = 1.67* (no), t = −0.58 (low), t = −0.65 (high)
Load × syntactic complexity × capacity Correlation: WM and (complex–simple) by Load
    LH language–memory 2, 23 7.17 0.022     r = −0.14 (no), r = 0.55** (low), r = 0.27 (high)
    LH-RH language 2, 23 3.81 0.022     r = −0.10 (no), r = 0.50** (low), r = 0.35* (high)
    RH language–memory 2, 23 4.04 0.021     r = −0.16 (no), r = 0.48** (low), r = 0.34* (high)
    RH language (within) 2, 23 4.14 0.03     r = 0.06 (no), r = 0.53** (low), r = 0.33* (high)

Note: Probabilities for follow-up: *P < 0.10, **P < 0.05. df, degrees of freedom.