Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 19;26(7):712–717. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1619-z

Table 3.

Predictors of Interpreter use for Three Types of Clinical Encounters* Among Patients (N = 234) at Two Hospitals in The San Francisco Bay Area, 2005-2008

With physician at admission With physicians since admission With nurses since admission
MV Adjusted OR (95% CI) P value MV Adjusted OR (95% CI) P value MV Adjusted OR (95% CI) P value
Age (per 10-year increase) 1.4 (1.1-1.8) 0.001 1.2 (0.9-1.4) 0.14 1.2 (1.0-1.5) 0.10
Sex 0.61 0.87 0.90
Men 0.9 (0.5-1.5) 1.0 (0.5-1.7) 1.0 (0.5-1.8)
Women Ref Ref Ref
Education 1.0 .30 0.05
Less than High School graduate 1.0 (0.5-2.0) 1.4 (0.7-2.8) 2.2 (1.0-4.9)
High School graduate or more Ref Ref Ref
Primary language 0.44 0.30 0.02
Cantonese/Mandarin 1.5 (0.5-4.6) 1.8 (0.6-5.1) 3.3 (1.2-9.3)
Spanish Ref Ref Ref
Medical co-morbidity score (per 1-pt increase) 1.0 (0.9-1.3) 0.64 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 0.51 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 0.41
Hospital Service 0.25 0.02 0.003
Medicine 0.7 (0.4-1.3) 2.1 (1.1-3.9) 2.6 (1.4-4.8)
Surgical Ref Ref Ref

*All odds ratios for a model adjusted for age, sex, education, primary language, medical co-morbidity score and hospital service