Table 2.
Recognition rates of GF, SURF and MRGF methods. Numbers of histogram bins n = 8, 10 and 16 were tested. Columns from left to right: Sitting-up(SU), sitting-still(SS), walking(WK), bowing(BW), crouching(CR), waist exercise(WE) and total average(ALL).
| SU | SS | WK | BW | CR | WE | ALL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GF | n = 8 | 91% | 72% | 75% | 70% | 86% | 91% | 81% |
| n = 10 | 86% | 93% | 84% | 82% | 94% | 91% | 88% | |
| n = 16 | 87% | 94% | 90% | 86% | 98% | 96% | 92% | |
| SURF | n = 8 | 95% | 94% | 82% | 88% | 84% | 94% | 90% |
| n = 10 | 96% | 96% | 90% | 89% | 93% | 95% | 93% | |
| n = 16 | 98% | 98% | 95% | 95% | 97% | 97% | 97% | |
| MRGF | n = 8 | 93% | 88% | 80% | 82% | 91% | 94% | 88% |
| n = 10 | 93% | 98% | 90% | 88% | 97% | 92% | 93% | |
| n = 16 | 95% | 98% | 92% | 92% | 98% | 97% | 95% | |