Skip to main content
. 2011 May 11;118(2):262–270. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-335174

Table 4.

Multivariate linear regression analysis of s1 for CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets with baseline CD4 T-cell count and baseline VL (log10) as covariates

CD4 naive s1 CD8 naive s1* CD4 CM s1 CD8 CM s1 CD4 EM s1 CD8 EM s1 CD4 Act s1 CD8 Act s1
Coefficient of CD4, × 103 (cells/μL) −0.021 −0.004 −0.019 −0.01 −0.067 −0.008 −0.124 −0.042
(P = .037) (P = .52) (P = .16) (P = .73) (P = .06) (P = .41) (P = .12) (P = .69)
Coefficient of log10VL, × 103 (log10 copies/mL) 0.901 2.526 3.522 3.291 12.733 4.613 5.516 −7.615
(P = .44) (P = .002) (P = .033) (P = .33) (P = .006) (P< .001) (P = .56) (P = .55)
R2 0.217 0.443 0.221 0.051 0.355 0.49 0.125 0.056

CM indicates central memory; EM, effector memory; and Act, activated.

*

One patient with very high naive CD8 T-cell estimate for s1 (38-fold higher than the average, statistically an outlier) was excluded from the CD8 naive analysis. Significant association with the VL is lost with the inclusion of this outlier.

One patient with very high effector memory CD4 T-cell estimate for s1 (24-fold higher than the average, statistically an outlier) was excluded from the CD4 EM analysis. Significant association with the VL is lost with the inclusion of this outlier.