Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):522–531. doi: 10.1037/a0020833

Table 1. Correlations for Variables in Mothers' Reports of Positive Control Model (below diagonal) and Adolescents' Reports Model (above diagonal).

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1. Family SES __ .14 .10 .13 .04 -.02 -.05 -.03 -.16* .02 .03 .14 .00 .03 .03
2. T1 positive control .33* __ .49* .45* .11 .11 .17* -.32* -.19* -.12 -.15 .01 -.04 -.07 -.02
3. T2 positive control .18* .59* __ .59* .18* .32* .29* -.23* -.22* -.32* -.24* -.14 -.14 -.24* .03
4. T3 positive control .15 .39* .57* __ .13 .11 .17* -.21* -.11 -.20* -.13 -.22* -.06 -.07 -.00
5. T1 self-efficacy .04 .50* .49* .44* __ .67* .68* -.21* -.49* -.21* -.11 -.25* -.42* -.18* -.12
6. T2 self-efficacy -.02 .34* .57* .57* .67* __ .72* -.13 -.45* -.18* -.10 -.20* -.51* -.19* -.02
7. T3 self-efficacy -.05 .27* .42* .65* .68* .72* __ -.19* -.37* -.17* -.08 -.22* -.45* -.17 -.03
8. T1 A conduct problems -.03 -.13 -.03 -.10 -.21* -.13 -.19* __ .39* .37* .26* .42* .24* .20* .23*
9. T1 M conduct problems -.16* -.35* -.31* -.27* -.49* -.45* -.37* .39* __ .32* .30* .27* .61* .35* .27*
10. T1 TL conduct problems .02 -.15 -.18* -.05 -.21* -.18* -.17* .37* .32* __ .60* .28* .21* .40* .37*
11. T1 TM conduct problems .03 -.20* -.03 -.05 -.11 -.10 -.08 .26* .30* .60* __ .21* .29* .31* .43*
12. T4 A conduct problems .14 .00 .00 -.10 -.25* -.20* -.22* .42* .27* .28* .21* __ .38* .20* .16
13. T4 M conduct problems .00 -.25* -.27* -.33* -.42* -.51* -.45* .24* .61* .21* .29* .38* __ .33* .32*
14. T4 TL conduct problems .03 .00 -.16 -.13 -.18* -.19* -.17 .20* .35* .40* .31* .20* .33* __ .46*
15. T4 TM conduct problems .03 -.01 .03 -.01 -.12 -.02 -.03 .23* .27* .37* .43* .16 .32* .46* __

Note. Mothers' (M), adolescents' (A), language teachers' (TL), math teachers' (TM) reports. N = 99 – 189.

*

p < .05.