Abstract
Background
Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract remain a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Ghrelin is a hormone produced in the oxyntic glands of the stomach, and under conditions of chronic inflammation and atrophy, serum ghrelin concentrations decrease. However, the relationship between ghrelin and the risk of gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancers has not been investigated.
Methods
We conducted a nested case–control study within the Finnish Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study to examine the relationship between serum ghrelin concentration and the risk of gastric noncardia adenocarcinoma (GNCA) and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJA). Data from 261 GNCA patients, 98 EGJA patients, and 441 control subjects were analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders. Lag analysis was also performed to investigate the temporal nature of the associations between baseline serum pepsinogen I and ghrelin in GNCA and EGJA patients. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results
Lower concentrations of serum ghrelin were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of both GNCA (adjusted OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.49 to 2.04; P < .001) and EGJA (adjusted OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.89, P < .001). A multivariable model found that the risk of both GNCA and EGJA were statistically significantly increased for those individuals in the lowest quartile of serum ghrelin levels compared with those in the highest quartile (OR of GNCA = 5.63, 95% CI = 3.16 to 10.03; OR of EGJA = 4.90, 95% CI = 2.11 to 11.35). The statistical significance of these associations remained even after restricting the analysis to those patients who developed cancer more than 10 years after baseline serum ghrelin measurements.
Conclusion
Low baseline concentrations of serum ghrelin were associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of GNCA and EGJA, suggesting a potential role for gastric hormones in carcinogenesis.
CONTEXT AND CAVEATS
Prior knowledge
Ghrelin is a gastric hormone that plays a role in various metabolic functions and mediates inflammation. Although there is a previous report that ghrelin may promote esophageal carcinoma, there are no previously published prospective epidemiological studies of serum ghrelin in gastric cancer.
Study design
Data from a prospective nested case–control study of 261 gastric noncardia adenocarcinoma and 98 esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma patients and 441 control subjects were analyzed by logistic regression and lag analysis to investigate the association and temporal relationship between serum ghrelin levels and the risk of gastric and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas.
Contribution
Lower serum ghrelin levels were associated with an increased risk of noncardia adenocarcinoma and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma that was statistically significant even for patients who were diagnosed more than 10 years after their enrollment in the study.
Implication
Serum ghrelin levels may have a role in the development of gastric and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas.
Limitations
The study population included male smokers only, thus the results may not be applicable to a heterogeneous population. Further studies are needed to elucidate the biological mechanism behind the relationship between serum ghrelin levels and gastric cancer risk.
From the Editors
Ghrelin, a hormone produced in the fundic (oxyntic) glands of the stomach, is known to have a variety of metabolic functions that range from stimulation of gastric acid and regulation of gastrointestinal tract motility to regulation of energy balance and control of appetite (1). In contrast to leptin, a satiety hormone, ghrelin plays a role in meal initiation with ghrelin blood levels rising before and falling after eating (1). The physiological actions of ghrelin are increasingly recognized as extending beyond metabolism; experimental data suggest that ghrelin is expressed in human T lymphocytes and monocytes and acts via the growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a to inhibit the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin 1β, interluekin 6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (2).
In 2008, there were approximately 989 000 new gastric cancers diagnosed globally and 738 000 deaths. Gastric cancer ranks as the fourth leading incident cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide (3). Helicobacter pylori (H pylori), a gram-negative spiral bacterium present in about half of the world’s population (4), is a strong risk factor for gastric noncardia adenocarcinoma (GNCA). Chronic H pylori infection can result in chronic gastritis that may progress to atrophic gastritis, in which gastric glands are destroyed and may ultimately be replaced by intestinal-type epithelium. In a small proportion of infected individuals, this inflammatory cascade can result in gastric neoplasia (5). In contrast, associations between H pylori and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJA) are unclear (6), but H pylori has been shown to reduce the risk of EGJA and esophageal adenocarcinomas in some studies (7).
The gastric mucosa hosts a variety of endocrine cell types and produces a myriad of hormones and peptides (8), including ghrelin. Chronic inflammation and atrophic gastritis in response to H pylori infection alter the hormonal milieu of the stomach (9–12). In fact, both chronic inflammation and atrophy have been associated with a decrease in plasma ghrelin, and eradication of H pylori is followed by an increase in plasma ghrelin (11,13,14). The consequences of these alterations in ghrelin levels and their contribution to gastric or esophageal carcinogenesis remain unknown.
Although serum ghrelin has been investigated for its role in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (15), at present, there are no prospective epidemiological studies investigating the role of serum ghrelin in gastric cancers. We investigated the association between serum ghrelin concentration and subsequent risk of GNCA and EGJA in a case–control study nested in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study.
Methods
Subjects in this study were drawn from the ATBC Study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled primary prevention trial designed to determine whether daily supplementation with α-tocopherol (50 mg/d), β-carotene (20 mg/d), or both, would reduce the incidence of lung cancers in male smokers (16). Between 1985 and 1988, 29 133 eligible Finnish male smokers aged 50–69 years were recruited to the ATBC Study. Although the trial ended in 1993, participants continued to be followed as a cohort. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of both the National Institutes of Health in the United States and the National Public Health Institutes in Finland. All participants provided written informed consent.
All control subjects had incident GNCA or EGJA diagnosed through April 30, 2006. Cancer patients were identified primarily via the Finnish Cancer Registry. Diagnosed gastric cancers were defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (17). GNCA patients included all patients coded as 151 and 151.1–151.9. We classified EGJA patients according to the World Health Organization classification of tumors of the digestive system (18), which defines EGJAs as: 1) adenocarcinomas that cross the esophagogastric junction; 2) adenocarcinomas located entirely above the esophagogastric junction; and 3) adenocarcinomas located entirely below the esophagogastric junction, considered gastric in origin, often referred to as carcinoma of the gastric cardia. EGJAs included patients coded as 150 and 151.0; all patients had adenocarcinoma (12 patients were coded as esophageal adenocarcinoma and the remaining 86 patients were coded as gastric cardia cancer). For patients diagnosed through April 1999 (n = 181 GNCA and n = 65 EGJA), two study physicians reviewed medical records for diagnostic confirmation and staging, and one pathologist reviewed histopathologic or cytological specimens when available. Information on gastric cancer patients diagnosed since May 1999 (n = 80 GNCA and n = 33 EGJA) was derived solely from the Finnish Cancer Registry, which provides almost 100% tumor ascertainment. Control subjects were alive and cancer-free at the time of entry into the trial and were matched to cancer patients by age at random assignment (±1 year), date of blood collection (±30 days), and sample availability.
Data Collection
Study participants completed questionnaires at ATBC study entry about general risk factors, medical history, and dietary intake. Dietary intake was assessed by a food-frequency questionnaire, by questions about usual food intake during the previous year including 276 common foods and mixed dishes, and by use of a picture booklet to aid estimation of portion size (19,20). The food-frequency questionnaire was satisfactorily completed by 27 110 of 29 151 participants (93%) at the time of study entry. The weights and heights of all participants were measured by trained study staff. Fasting blood samples were collected from participants at the start of the study (1985–1988), and serum samples were stored at −70°C.
Laboratory Analysis
Adequate serum samples for ghrelin analysis were collected from 261 incident GNCA patients, 98 EGJA patients, and 441 control subjects. Total ghrelin was measured by radioimmunoassay using reagents obtained from Millipore Linco Research (St Charles, MO). The radioimmunoassay uses a rabbit anti-ghrelin polyclonal antibody and requires 0.1 mL of serum for a 2-day disequilibrium assay. Using 98 blinded quality control samples from a single serum pool from the ATBC Study, the coefficient of variation for these assays was calculated as 11.6% and the intraclass correlation was 89%.
H pylori (whole cell) seropositivity was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Biohit Diagnostics, Helsinki, Finland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each assay included two quality control samples provided by the manufacturer and three blinded quality control samples from a single serum pool from the ATBC Study. All samples were assayed in duplicate. A cut point was used to determine H pylori positivity. Concordance of H pylori positivity among quality control samples was 100%.
Serum pepsinogen I measurements were performed in two laboratories. Samples were assayed at the University of California (Los Angeles, CA) between 1989 and 1991. After the facility was damaged by an earthquake in 1991, the remaining serum samples were assayed at the University of Helsinki (Helsinki, Finland), from 1992 to 1993 (21–23). The results of the serum pepsinogen I measurements from both laboratories were correlated and standardized. A low serum pepsinogen I level was defined as 25 μg/L or less. Using quality control samples (∼10%) from the ATBC Study, the coefficients of variation for these assays were between 10% and 13% (23).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 10.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX), and all P values were two-sided. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. The distributions of baseline characteristics across GNCA and EGJA relative to control subjects were compared using Student t tests for continuous variables and Pearson χ2 tests for categorical variables. The associations between baseline characteristics and serum ghrelin quartiles were determined using the Jonckheere–Terpstra test for trend for continuous variables and the Mantel–Haenszel trend test for categorical variables (SAS, version 9.1.3; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Both tests were two-sided.
Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for associations between serum ghrelin concentration and the risk of GNCA and EGJA were calculated by unconditional logistic regression models. When we modeled ghrelin as a continuous variable, the odds ratios were scaled to 181 pg/mL (half of the interquartile range observed in control subjects, [Q3 − Q1]/2). Multivariable models of risk were adjusted for: age at randomization, total years of smoking and total cigarettes per day, alcohol (g/d), body mass index (kg/m2), fruit intake (g/d), vegetable intake (g/d), post-primary school education (yes or no), H pylori (positive or negative), low pepsinogen I (≤25 μg/L), and ATBC Study treatment group assignment. Lag analysis was also performed: GNCA and EGJA patients were classified according to whether they occurred within 5 years of baseline, between 5 and 10 years of baseline, or more than 10 years after baseline. Estimates derived from conditional and unconditional logistic regression models were similar, and as such, only the results of the unconditional models, which offered more precise risk estimates, are reported.
Results
Baseline characteristics of the patients and control subjects are shown in Table 1. Incident cancers included 261 GNCA and 98 EGJA patients. Cigarette smoking (cigarettes per day) was higher in EGJA patients than in control subjects, GNCA patients were more likely to be H pylori seropositive, and both EGJA and GNCA patients were more likely to have low baseline levels of serum pepsinogen I.
Table 1.
Variable | Control subjects | GNCA patients | P | EGJA patients | P |
Total No. of participants | 441 | 261 | NA | 98 | NA |
Mean age at baseline, y (SD) | 58.3 (4.9) | 58.2 (5.0) | .79 | 57.9 (4.9) | .20† |
Years of smoking, mean (SD) | 36.5 (8.3) | 36.8 (9.4) | .62 | 37.4 (7.4) | .29† |
Mean No. of cigarettes per day (SD) | 18.9 (8.5) | 20.2 (8.9) | .06 | 21.3 (9.3) | .01† |
Mean alcohol intake, g/d (SD) | 16.0 (17.6) | 16.6 (19.4) | .67 | 14.5 (15.7) | .45† |
Post-primary school education, No. (%) | 40 (23.0) | 26 (14.9) | .06 | 20 (20.4) | .35‡ |
Mean body mass index, kg/m2 (SD) | 26.4 (3.9) | 26.2 (3.9) | .52 | 26.8 (4.0) | .37† |
Mean fruit intake, g/d (SD) | 224.6 (207.0) | 200.7 (156.8) | .12 | 213.5 (170.3) | .64† |
Mean vegetable intake, g/d (SD) | 301.4 (111.5) | 284.5 (105.5) | .06 | 289.9 (109.4) | .38† |
Helicobacter pylori positive, No. (%) | 253 (72.9) | 238 (91.5) | <.001 | 64 (74.4) | .77‡ |
Pepsinogen I (≤25 μg/L), No. (%) | 17 (4.2) | 17 (8.5) | .03 | 9 (12.3) | .005‡ |
NA = not applicable, SD = standard deviation.
P values were calculated by a two-sided Student t test.
P values were calculated by a two-sided Pearson χ2 test.
Among control subjects, serum ghrelin was positively associated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day and education whereas levels were inversely associated with body mass index, H pylori seropositivity, and low serum pepsinogen I. In addition, there were no associations between age, mean years of smoking, alcohol intake, fruit intake and vegetable intake with serum ghrelin levels in these subjects (Table 2). In a multivariable linear regression model for predictors of serum ghrelin, only the inverse associations with body mass index and H pylori seropositivity remained statistically significant (data not shown).
Table 2.
Control subject characteristic | Quartile |
Ptrend | |||
Q1 (<549 pg/mL) | Q2 (549–703 pg/mL) | Q3 (703–911 pg/mL) | Q4 (>911 pg/mL) | ||
Mean age at baseline | 59 | 59 | 58 | 58 | .13† |
Mean No. of years of smoking, y | 36.6 | 36.0 | 36.3 | 36.9 | .66† |
Mean No. of cigarettes per day | 19.0 | 17.5 | 19.1 | 20.3 | .05† |
Mean alcohol intake, g/d | 15.9 | 16.3 | 15.0 | 17.1 | .35† |
Post-primary school education, No. (%) | 21 (19.1) | 18 (16.5) | 28 (25.5) | 32 (29.4) | .03* |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 27.0 | 26.5 | 26.8 | 25.3 | .01† |
Mean fruit intake, g/d | 227.3 | 226.8 | 246.9 | 195.5 | .19† |
Mean vegetable intake, g/d | 306.8 | 282.3 | 300.3 | 311.7 | .24† |
Helicobacter pylori positive, No. (%) | 91 (82.7) | 85 (79.4) | 83 (75.5) | 61 (56.5) | <.001* |
Pepsinogen I ≤ 25 μg/L, No. (%) | 10 (10.4) | 2 (2.0) | 4 (3.9) | 1 (1.0) | .01* |
A two-sided Mantel–Haenszel trend test for categorical variables was used to calculate P values.
Jonckheere–Terpstra test for trend for continuous variables was used to calculate P values. This statistical test was two-sided.
Baseline serum ghrelin (as a continuous variable, scaled to half the interquartile range of serum ghrelin in the control subjects, [Q3 − Q1]/2) was statistically significantly inversely associated with the risk of GNCA (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.61 to 2.17) and EGJA (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.82) in an age-adjusted model (Table 3). These associations remained statistically significant for both cancer sites following multivariable adjustment (OR of GNCA = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.49 to 2.04; OR of EGJA = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.89).
Table 3.
Type of gastric cancer | Continuous* |
Quartile |
Ptrend | ||||
OR (95% CI) | P | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
GNCA | |||||||
Age adjusted | 1.89 (1.61 to 2.17) | <.001 | 7.53 (4.35 to 13.03) | 3.77 (2.13 to 6.69) | 1.21 (0.62 to 2.35) | 1.0 (referent) | <.001 |
Adjusted† | 1.75 (1.49 to 2.04) | <.001 | 5.63 (3.16 to 10.03) | 2.73 (1.49 to 5.04) | 0.96 (0.48 to 1.92) | 1.0 (referent) | <.001 |
EGJA | |||||||
Age adjusted | 1.52 (1.25 to 1.82) | <.001 | 4.10 (1.96 to 8.59) | 3.23 (1.52 to 6.90) | 1.26 (0.53 to 3.00) | 1.0 (referent) | <.001 |
Adjusted† | 1.56 (1.28 to 1.89) | <.001 | 4.90 (2.11 to 11.35) | 4.27 (1.80 to 10.17) | 1.59 (0.62 to 4.08) | 1.0 (referent) | <.001 |
Continuous odds ratios are scaled to 181 pg/mL, which is one half of the interquartile range in the control subjects ([Q3 − Q1]/2).
Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by logistic regression models adjusted for age at randomization, total years of smoking, total cigarettes per day, alcohol (g/d), body mass index (kg/m2), fruit intake (g/d), vegetable intake (g/d), post-primary school education (yes or no), Helicobacter pylori (positive or negative), low serum pepsinogen I (≤25 μg/L), and Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention treatment group. P values for trend were calculated by two-sided linear trend tests.
When divided into ghrelin serum quartiles on the basis of the distribution of the control subjects, the risk of GNCA and EGJA increased statistically significantly and monotonically from the highest to the lowest quartile of baseline serum ghrelin (Ptrend < .001 for GNCA and EGJA) (Table 3). Following adjustment, those in the lowest quartile of serum ghrelin had a statistically significant increased risk of both GNCA (OR = 5.63, 95% CI = 3.16 to 10.03) and EGJA (OR = 4.90, 95% CI = 2.11 to 11.35). Models were stratified according to whether tumors were intestinal or diffuse and if the association did not differ between tumor types (data not shown).
The temporal nature of the associations between baseline serum pepsinogen I and ghrelin was explored by performing a lag analysis (Table 4). Overall, low serum pepsinogen I at baseline was associated with an increased risk of GNCA (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 0.85 to 3.71) and EGJA (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.18 to 7.59); however, the statistically significant increase in the risk of cancer noted for those with low baseline serum pepsinogen I was confined to the first 5 years after baseline for GNCA (OR = 6.82, 95% CI = 2.86 to 16.26) and EGJA (OR = 23.21, 95% CI = 4.55 to 118.36). By contrast, the statistically significant inverse association between baseline serum ghrelin and risk of GNCA and EGJA was observed across all periods, although the magnitude of the association was attenuated over time.
Table 4.
Time to diagnosis relative to baseline | No. of patients (%) | Pepsinogen I† |
Pepsinogen I‡ |
Ghrelin† |
Ghrelin§ |
||||
OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | ||
GNCA | |||||||||
Total No. of patients | 261 | 1.77 (0.85 to 3.71) | .13 | 1.09 (0.50 to 2.40) | .83 | 1.75 (1.49 to 2.04) | <.001 | 1.79 (1.52 to 2.13) | <.001 |
<5 y | 70 (27) | 6.82 (2.86 to 16.26) | <.001 | 3.27 (1.24 to 8.65) | .02 | 2.56 (1.89 to 3.57) | <.001 | 2.56 (1.72 to 3.85) | <.001 |
5–10 y | 95 (36) | 0.47 (0.10 to 2.12) | .32 | 0.36 (0.08 to 1.67) | .19 | 1.67 (1.35 to 2.08) | <.001 | 1.70 (1.32 to 2.17) | <.001 |
>10 y | 96 (37) | 0.54 (0.12 to 2.45) | .43 | 0.38 (0.08 to 1.78) | .22 | 1.61 (1.30 to 2.00) | <.001 | 1.72 (1.35 to 2.22) | <.001 |
EGJA | |||||||||
Total No. of patients | 98 | 3.00 (1.18 to 7.59) | .02 | 2.11 (0.81 to 5.50) | .13 | 1.56 (1.28 to 1.89) | <.001 | 1.67 (1.33 to 2.13) | <.001 |
<5 y | 23 (24) | 23.21 (4.55 to 118.36) | <.001 | 17.60 (3.24 to 95.67) | .001 | 2.04 (1.30 to 3.23) | .002 | 2.33 (1.27 to 4.35) | .007 |
5–10 y | 31 (32) | 1.04 (0.13 to 8.55) | .97 | 0.73 (0.09 to 6.21) | .77 | 1.79 (1.25 to 2.56) | .002 | 1.82 (1.18 to 2.78) | .007 |
>10 y | 44 (45) | 2.24 (0.59 to 8.50) | .24 | 1.63 (0.42 to 6.38) | .48 | 1.32 (1.03 to 1.69) | .03 | 1.47 (1.10 to 1.96) | .009 |
CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.
Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by models adjusted for age at randomization, total years of smoking and total cigarettes per day, alcohol (g/d), body mass index (kg/m2), fruit intake (g/d), vegetable intake (g/d), post-primary school education, Helicobacter pylori (positive or negative), and Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention treatment group.
Model was adjusted for age at randomization, total years of smoking and total cigarettes per day, alcohol (g/d), body mass index (kg/m2), fruit intake (g/d), vegetable intake (g/d), post-primary school education (yes or no), Helicobacter pylori (positive or negative), Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention treatment group, and ghrelin (continuous, scaled to one half of the interquartile range, [Q3 − Q1]/2).
Model was adjusted for age at randomization, total years of smoking and total cigarettes per day, alcohol (g/d), body mass index (kg/m2), fruit intake (g/d), vegetable intake (g/d), post-primary school education (yes or no), Helicobacter pylori (positive or negative), Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention treatment group, and low serum pepsinogen I (≤25 μg/L).
We also mutually adjusted for pepsinogen I and ghrelin, and risk estimates for serum pepsinogen I for those cancers diagnosed within the first 5 years were only modestly attenuated when adjustment included serum ghrelin. However, for all other time intervals, risk estimates for low serum pepsinogen I were non-statistically significant for either GNCA and EGJA using these models, although risk estimates for ghrelin remained statistically significant but slightly attenuated across all periods (Table 4).
Discussion
This case–control study nested within the ATBC Study cohort provides evidence, for the first time to our knowledge, of a statistically significant increase in the risk of both GNCA and EGJA for individuals with lower baseline serum ghrelin concentrations. This statistically significant increased risk of gastric cancer was independent of the baseline pepsinogen I concentration and H pylori infection and was present even for patients diagnosed more than 10 years after baseline. In contrast, the increased risk of GNCA and EGJA noted for those with low serum pepsinogen I was confined to cancers developing less than 5 years after baseline.
Although to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have reported the relationship between serum ghrelin concentration and the risk of gastric cancer, one study nested in a multiphasic health checkup cohort in the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (California) analyzed serum ghrelin concentrations in 31 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients and 79 matched control subjects (15). Similar to our results in EGJA cancers, the authors found an adverse relationship between lower serum ghrelin and esophageal adenocarcinoma for those in the lowest quartile of serum ghrelin concentration (OR = 5.55, 95% CI = 1.28 to 25.0). This association with esophageal adenocarcinoma, like the EGJA association that we report here, was found to be independent of H pylori.
In a previous analysis from the ATBC Study cohort, we reported that H pylori infection was statistically significantly inversely associated with adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (referred to as gastric cardia adenocarcinomas in that report) (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.89) and was a statistically significant risk factor for GNCA (OR = 7.9, 95% CI = 3.0 to 20.9) (6). In contrast to this striking difference in H pylori association, in the current analysis, both low serum pepsinogen I and low serum ghrelin were statistically significantly associated with increased risk of adenocarcinoma at both sites, suggesting that the carcinogenic effect of H pylori may not always be mediated by gastric fundic atrophy, at least in the esophagogastric junctional region.
Like ghrelin, the proenzyme pepsinogen I, is also produced in the gastric fundic mucosa. Pepsinogen I is commonly used to serologically indicate the presence of gastric fundic atrophy, the destruction of the fundic glands and frequent sequelae of chronic inflammation, and it has been investigated as a possible early detection marker for gastric cancer (24,25). Gastric fundic atrophy also results in destruction of the ghrelin-producing cells in the fundic mucosa (1), so ghrelin may be a marker worth investigating for its potential in identifying early gastric cancer.
Our analysis suggests, however, that ghrelin and pepsinogen may act differently in the context of upper gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. When risk was calculated by time from baseline to the development of cancer, the increase in risk of GNCA and EGJA associated with low baseline serum pepsinogen I was confined to those cancers occurring within 5 years of baseline, indicating that serum pepsinogen I may be altered only in the latter stages of carcinogenesis. Similar temporal associations between serum pepsinogen I and gastric cancer have been previously noted (26–28). In contrast, the increase in risk of GNCA and EGJA associated with low baseline serum ghrelin remained statistically significant for cancers occurring long after baseline, indicating that changes in serum ghrelin may occur early in the carcinogenic process, long before the development of the tumor, and that ghrelin may be involved in the etiology of these upper gastrointestinal cancers.
The potential role of ghrelin in carcinogenesis is not yet known; however, data regarding ghrelin’s relevance to both inflammation and carcinogenesis have been reported. The relationship between ghrelin and inflammation preceding atrophy is likely complex: Whereas most studies report that ghrelin has predominantly anti-inflammatory associations (2), there are also data to suggest that ghrelin may be associated with increased inflammation in some situations (2,29,30). In a study of plasma ghrelin levels across various gastrointestinal disorders, the lowest ghrelin levels were associated with chronic gastritis, whereas the highest levels of ghrelin were seen in patients with acute gastritis and patients with gastric cancer (31,32). Higher circulating ghrelin levels among cancer patients may be the result of a compensatory response, possibly involving secretion of ghrelin from auxiliary ghrelin-producing organs (such as the small and large intestines, the kidney, or the lung); however, the mechanism and function of such a response, if it occurs, are unknown (13,33).
The relationship between ghrelin and carcinogenesis appears similarly complicated. Colorectal carcinoma cells are reported to secrete excessive ghrelin in vitro, and in these cells, ghrelin appears to act in both an autocrine and a paracrine manner to promote the proliferative and invasive nature of the cells (34). An increase in proliferation in response to secreted ghrelin has also been observed in human pancreatic and hepatoma cell lines (35,36). However, studies of human thyroid, breast, and prostate cancer cell lines have shown that ghrelin induces both proliferative and antiproliferative effects, which are often dependent on the histological cell type and the dose and timing of ghrelin administration (30,37–39). Further studies are needed to characterize the interaction between ghrelin, inflammation, and carcinogenesis in different organs.
The prospective design of our study is one of its major strengths because baseline prediagnostic serum for analysis of ghrelin, H pylori infection, and pepsinogen I was collected for analyses. The ATBC Study also includes substantial covariable information that allowed for adjustment for potential confounders.
The ATBC Study includes only male smokers, and as such, the generalizability of our findings may be limited. Unfortunately, data regarding serum pepsinogen II serostatus was unavailable in this analysis, thus preventing the use of both low pepsinogen I levels and low pepsinogen I/II ratio as indicators of gastric atrophy. H pylori CagA serostatus, a marker of H pylori infection virulence, was also unavailable, although the data indicate that H pylori infection did not substantially modulate the risk associated with low ghrelin. As with all epidemiological studies, the possibility of residual confounding cannot be excluded.
In conclusion, in this large prospective study, we found that individuals with lower baseline serum concentrations of ghrelin had a statistically significant increase in the risk of both GNCA and EGJA. Serum ghrelin levels may be a useful marker of gastric fundic atrophy and may also have a role in the etiology of gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancers. The gastrointestinal tract can be thought of as an endocrine organ, and further studies investigating the effects of alterations in the hormonal milieu of the stomach in response to H pylori infection and subsequent atrophy that could drive gastric carcinogenesis are needed.
Funding
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study was supported by funding provided by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute and US Public Health Service contracts (N01-CN-45165, N01-RC-45035, and N01-RC-37004).
Footnotes
The funding sources had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; writing of the article; or the decision to submit the article for publication.
References
- 1.Higgins SC, Gueorguiev M, Korbonits M. Ghrelin, the peripheral hunger hormone. Ann Med. 2007;39(2):116–136. doi: 10.1080/07853890601149179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dixit VD, Schaffer EM, Pyle RS, et al. Ghrelin inhibits leptin- and activation-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression by human monocytes and T cells. J Clin Invest. 2004;114(1):57–66. doi: 10.1172/JCI21134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–2917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori in health and disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(6):1863–1873. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Correa P. A human model of gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1988;48(13):3554–3560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kamangar F, Dawsey SM, Blaser MJ, et al. Opposing risks of gastric cardia and noncardia gastric adenocarcinomas associated with Helicobacter pylori seropositivity. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(20):1445–1452. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Islami F, Kamangar F. Helicobacter pylori and esophageal cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Prev Res. 2008;1(5):329–338. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rindi G, Leiter AB, Kopin AS, Bordi C, Solcia E. The “normal” endocrine cell of the gut: changing concepts and new evidences. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1014:1–12. doi: 10.1196/annals.1294.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saha A, Hammond CE, Beeson C, Peek RM, Jr., Smolka AJ. Helicobacter pylori represses proton pump expression and inhibits acid secretion in human gastric mucosa. Gut. 2010;59(7):874–881. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.194795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Watson SA, Grabowska AM, El-Zaatari M, Takhar A. Gastrin—active participant or bystander in gastric carcinogenesis? Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(12):936–946. doi: 10.1038/nrc2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Isomoto H, Ueno H, Saenko VA, et al. Impact of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric and plasma ghrelin dynamics in humans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(8):1711–1720. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Calam J. The somatostatin-gastrin link of Helicobacter pylori infection. Ann Med. 1995;27(5):569–573. doi: 10.3109/07853899509002471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Suzuki H, Masaoka T, Hosoda H, et al. Plasma ghrelin concentration correlates with the levels of serum pepsinogen I and pepsinogen I/II ratio–a possible novel and non-invasive marker for gastric atrophy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51(59):1249–1254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nwokolo CU, Freshwater DA, O’Hare P, Randeva HS. Plasma ghrelin following cure of Helicobacter pylori. Gut. 2003;52(5):637–640. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.5.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Martel C, Haggerty TD, Corley DA, Vogelman JH, Orentreich N, Parsonnet J. Serum ghrelin levels and risk of subsequent adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(6):1166–1172. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.The ATBC Cancer Prevention Study Group. The alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene lung cancer prevention study: design, methods, participant characteristics, and compliance. Ann Epidemiol. 1994;4(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1978. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, editors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pietinen P, Hartman AM, Haapa E, et al. Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. II. A qualitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(3):667–676. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pietinen P, Hartman AM, Haapa E, et al. Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. I. A self-administered food use questionnaire with a portion size picture booklet. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(3):655–666. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Samloff IM. Pepsinogens I and II: purification from gastric mucosa and radioimmunoassay in serum. Gastroenterology. 1982;82(1):26–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Varis K, Taylor PR, Sipponen P, et al. Gastric cancer and premalignant lesions in atrophic gastritis: a controlled trial on the effect of supplementation with alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene. The Helsinki Gastritis Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33(3):294–300. doi: 10.1080/00365529850170892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Varis K, Sipponen P, Laxen F, et al. Implications of serum pepsinogen I in early endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer and dysplasia. Helsinki Gastritis Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(9):950–956. doi: 10.1080/003655200750023011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stemmermann GN, Samloff IM, Nomura AM, Heilbrun LK. Serum pepsinogens I and II and stomach cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;163(2):191–198. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(87)90022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nomura AM, Stemmermann GN, Samloff IM. Serum pepsinogen I as a predictor of stomach cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93(4):537–540. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-93-4-537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ren JS, Kamangar F, Qiao YL, et al. Serum pepsinogens and risk of gastric and oesophageal cancers in the General Population Nutrition Intervention Trial cohort. Gut. 2009;58(5):636–642. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.168641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aromaa A, Kosunen TU, Knekt P, et al. Circulating anti-Helicobacter pylori immunoglobulin A antibodies and low serum pepsinogen I level are associated with increased risk of gastric cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(2):142–149. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Iwasaki M, et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection combined with CagA and pepsinogen status on gastric cancer development among Japanese men and women: a nested case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(7):1341–1347. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nikolopoulos D, Theocharis S, Kouraklis G. Ghrelin: a potential therapeutic target for cancer. Regul Pept. 2010;163(1–3):7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2010.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nikolopoulos D, Theocharis S, Kouraklis G. Ghrelin’s role on gastrointestinal tract cancer. Surg Oncol. 2010;19(1):e2–e10. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Isomoto H, Ueno H, Nishi Y, et al. Circulating ghrelin levels in patients with various upper gastrointestinal diseases. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50(5):833–838. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-2648-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nagaya N, Uematsu M, Kojima M, et al. Elevated circulating level of ghrelin in cachexia associated with chronic heart failure: relationships between ghrelin and anabolic/catabolic factors. Circulation. 2001;104(17):2034–2038. doi: 10.1161/hc4201.097836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Suzuki H, Masaoka T, Hosoda H, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection modifies gastric and plasma ghrelin dynamics in Mongolian gerbils. Gut. 2004;53(2):187–194. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.021568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Waseem T, Javaid Ur R, Ahmad F, Azam M, Qureshi MA. Role of ghrelin axis in colorectal cancer: a novel association. Peptides. 2008;29(8):1369–1376. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Murata M, Okimura Y, Iida K, et al. Ghrelin modulates the downstream molecules of insulin signaling in hepatoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(7):5667–5674. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103898200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Duxbury MS, Waseem T, Ito H, et al. Ghrelin promotes pancreatic adenocarcinoma cellular proliferation and invasiveness. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;309(2):464–468. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cassoni P, Ghe C, Marrocco T, et al. Expression of ghrelin and biological activity of specific receptors for ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin in human prostate neoplasms and related cell lines. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;150(2):173–184. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1500173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jeffery PL, Herington AC, Chopin LK. Expression and action of the growth hormone releasing peptide ghrelin and its receptor in prostate cancer cell lines. J Endocrinol. 2002;172(3):R7–R11. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.172r007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yeh AH, Jeffery PL, Duncan RP, Herington AC, Chopin LK. Ghrelin and a novel preproghrelin isoform are highly expressed in prostate cancer and ghrelin activates mitogen-activated protein kinase in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(23):8295–8303. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]