Table 1.
Gene | Probe name | Sequence 5′–3′ | R 2 | Efficiency (%) | Amplicon size (bp) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMP a | all_v2.0.1631.C1 | Forward | ATTGCAATTTCACCCTGAGC | 0.999 | 94 | 118 |
Reverse | CCAGACCTGCTCCTTCTCAC | |||||
GmSCYA123 a | EX175275_probe3 | Forward | CTCAAACCTCTGCATCGTCA | 0.997 | 96 | 188 |
Reverse | CACGGAGAGGTAAGCAGCTC | |||||
HAMP a | all_v2.0.796.C2 | Forward | CCACAGGCTCCTCTCAAGTC | 0.988 | 89 | 146 |
Reverse | CTGCAACTGCAATGCTGAAT | |||||
IL8 a | all_v2.0.37.C2 | Forward | CCAATCTGACGGCTCTCTGT | 0.990 | 103 | 116 |
Reverse | ATCGGCTCCCTACTGGTTCT | |||||
C1S | sb_gmnlsfas_0002o02.t7 | Forward | TCACTGACCGTTGAGACTCG | 0.999 | 100 | 134 |
Reverse | CCATTGTTGGAGCCGTAGTT | |||||
CEBPB2 | all_v2.0.3759.C1 | Forward | ACTCCGCAACCTGCTCTCT | 0.995 | 99 | 183 |
Reverse | GGTGATGGCTGTTTTCACCT | |||||
CTSL | all_v2.0.8187.C1 | Forward | CTACGAGGCTGAGGATGGAC | 0.999 | 99 | 109 |
Reverse | GGCCTTCTGTAGGGCTTTCT | |||||
SDF1 | all_v2.0.9962.C1 | Forward | GCGCAGACATGGATATGAAA | 0.999 | 95 | 115 |
Reverse | GAGCGGCAGTAGCATCTCTC | |||||
all_v2.0.2958.C1 | all_v2.0.2958.C1 | Forward | CCCAAAAAGGTCTTTGGTCA | 0.989 | 105 | 140 |
Reverse | CTCCCCAAGCACATTTAACC | |||||
all_v2.0.6615.C2 | all_v2.0.6615.C2 | Forward | ACGCTGGGAAAATGAATCAC | 0.993 | 89 | 176 |
Reverse | TGAAACCTTATTGCCGGTTC | |||||
BPI/LBP | all_v2.0.992.C2 | Forward | TCGGATCCCTTAGCAACATC | 0.998 | 100 | 134 |
Reverse | GATTTGCAGCTGGGTGTTTT | |||||
IIGP_b | all_v2.0.3462.C1 | Forward | ACGACACAATGAGTGCCAAG | 0.999 | 97 | 126 |
Reverse | TTCCTGCTCCACACTCTCCT | |||||
CYBB | all_v2.0.1278.C1 | Forward | TTGTGTAGCGTGTCGTTGAA | 0.995 | 94 | 131 |
Reverse | GGAAACTGAAACGCAAAAGC | |||||
GmSCYA104 | EX731124_probe1 | Forward | GATCCGAGGGTCACTGAATG | 0.991 | 90 | 104 |
Reverse | GCATTGACGCAGGGATAGTT | |||||
IIGP_a | all_v2.0.13188.C1 | Forward | TACTGGTGTGGTGGAAACGA | 0.998 | 96 | 106 |
Reverse | TGAGAATGTGGTGGTTCCAA | |||||
18Sb | Forward | ATGGCCGTTCTTAGTTGGTG | 0.990 | 109 | 180 | |
Reverse | GGACATTTAAGGGCGTCTCA |
Genes in bold were shown to be Asal-responsive in SSH analysis (Feng et al. 2009). Genes in italics were chosen from the less stringent (FDR cutoff 0.05) gene list (ESM Table S2)
aPrimers for these genes were designed and tested previously (Feng et al. 2009)
bPrimers for 18S ribosomal RNA were designed and tested previously (Rise et al. 2008)