. 2011 Aug 1;4(4):234–240. doi: 10.1593/tlo.11115

Table 1.

CXCR4 Expression on MDAMB231 and MDAMB231^CXCR4+ Cells Incubated at Different Conditions (n = 3–6).

	Cell Type		Signal Intensity Difference MDAMB231 and MDAMB231^CXCR4+

	MDAMB231 MFIR ± SD	MDAMB231^CXCR4+ MFIR ± SD
12G5-PE
Live cells; on ice	1.116 ± 0.054	4.920 ± 1.463	4.4^*
Live cells; RT	1.160 ± 0.108	8.747 ± 1.245	7.5^†
Fixed cells; on ice	7.380 ± 3.573	11.046 ± 2.143	1.5
2B11-PE
Live cells; on ice	1.179 ± 0.072	1.487 ± 0.051	1.3^†
Live cells; RT	1.206 ± 0.047	1.435 ± 0.042	1.2^†
Fixed cells; on ice	18.814 ± 6.636	13.378 ± 3.267	0.7
Ac-TZ14011-FITC
Live cells; on ice	2.337 ± 0.341	5.505 ± 0.900	2.4^†
Live cells; RT	2.970 ± 0.289	4.941 ± 0.487	1.7^*
Fixed cells; on ice	25.788 ± 1.575	62.357 ± 7.920	2.4^†

For significance: MDAMB231 MFIRs were compared to MDAMB231^CXCR4+ MFIRs.

P ≤ .05.

^†

P ≤ .005.