Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 8;32(5):741–747. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr020

Table II.

Associations between Wnt antagonist methylation and age, sex, MSI status, MSI-associated features and BRAF V600E status in Ontario

Ontario
DKK1
SFRP1
Unmethylated (%) Methylated (%) ORb (95% CI) P Unmethylated (%) Highly methylated (%) ORc (95% CI) Pd
Age
    <50 55 (11.5) 6 (8.5) 1.0 0.55 9 (32.1) 9 (6.4) 1.0 0.001a
    50+ 422 (88.5) 65 (91.5) 1.4 (0.6–3.4) 19 (67.9) 132 (93.6) 7.0 (2.5–19.7)
Sex
    Male 266 (55.8) 20 (28.2) 1.0 1.96 × 10−5,a 9 (32.1) 84 (59.6) 1.0 0.02
    Female 211 (44.2) 51 (71.8) 3.2 (1.9–5.6) 19 (67.9) 57 (40.4) 0.3 (0.1–0.8)
Location
    Distal 311 (65.9) 21 (30.9) 1.0 8.38 × 10−8,a 15 (55.6) 98 (70.0) 1.0 0.05
    Proximal 161 (34.1) 47 (69.1) 4.3 (2.5–7.5) 12 (44.4) 42 (30.0) 0.5 (0.2–1.2)
Histological type
    Non-mucinous 395 (89.0) 50 (76.9) 1.0 0.01 22 (81.5) 118 (91.5) 1.0 0.18
    Mucinous 49 (11.0) 15 (23.1) 2.4 (1.3–4.6) 5 (18.5) 11 (8.5) 0.4 (0.1–1.3)
MSI status
    MSS 427 (90.5) 29 (40.8) 1.0 5.46 × 10−20,a 22 (81.5) 132 (94.3) 1.0 1.33 × 10−4,a
    MSI 45 (9.5%) 42 (59.2%) 13.7 (7.8–24.2) 5 (18.5) 8 (5.7) 0.3 (0.1–0.9)
MMR protein status
    Intact 419 (92.1) 29 (42.6) 1.0 3.94 × 10−20,a 22 (81.5) 126 (94.0) 1.0 0.002a
    Deficient 36 (7.9) 39 (57.4) 15.7 (8.7–28.2) 5 (18.5) 8 (6.0) 0.3 (0.1–0.9)
MMR germ line mutation
    No 139 (92.1) 42 (95.5) 1.0 0.74 7 (70.0) 41 (100.0) 1.0 0.009
    Yes 12 (7.9) 2 (4.5) 0.6 (0.1–2.6) 3 (30.0) 0 (0.0) 0.2 (0.04–0.7)e
MLH1 methylation
    No 462 (97.1) 33 (46.5) 1.0 2.32 × 10−27,a 27 (96.4) 135 (95.7) 1.0 0.01
    Yes 14 (2.9) 38 (53.5) 38.0 (18.7–77.1) 1 (3.6) 6 (4.3) 1.2 (0.1–10.4)
BRAF V600E
    No 437 (94.4) 29 (43.9) 1.0 2.82 × 10−22,a 26 (96.3) 128 (93.4) 1.0 0.02
    Yes 26 (5.6) 37 (56.1) 22.4 (11.5–40.1) 1 (3.7) 9 (6.6) 1.8 (0.2–15.1)
a

Significant P-value after Bonferroni correction (P < 5.55 × 10−3).

b

Odds ratio for DKK1 methylated versus DKK1 unmethylated. Corresponding P-value indicated.

c

Odds ratio for SFRP1 highly methylated versus SFRP1 unmethylated.

d

P-value for the trend over all three SFRP1 methylation groups. See supplementary Table 1 (available at Carcinogenesis Online) for representation of SFRP1 low methylation.

e

Due to zero cell count, odds ratio represents SFRP1 methylated versus SFRP1 unmethylated.