Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 21;6(7):e21995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021995

Table 2. Household bednet and insecticide treated bednet (ITN) ownership in eight districts, Malawi, 2009 (N = 7,407).

Households eligible for health facility-based ITN distribution
All households (N = 7,407) Households with at least one child <5 years old (N = 5,266) Households with at least one pregnant woman (N = 631) Households with at least one child <5 years old or pregnant woman (N = 5,438) Households ineligible for health facility- based ITN distribution (N = 1,969)
% (95%CI)a % (95%CI)a % (95%CI)a % (95%CI)a % (95%CI)a
Any bednet 68% (65–70) 73% (70–75) 69% (64–74) 73% (70–75) 55% (50–60)
Any ITN 59% (56–62) 67% (64–70) 60% (53–66) 67% (64–70) 40% (36–45)
ITN obtained from a health facility 57% (54–59) 65% (62–68) 58% (52–64) 64% (61–67) 36% (32–40)
ITN obtained from a campaign 2% (2–3) 2% (2–3) 3% (1–5) 2% (2–3) 2% (1–3)
ITN purchased in market 2% (1–3) 1% (1–2) 1% (0–2) 1% (1–2) 4% (2–6)
Mean number of ITNs per household 0.86 (0.80–0.91) 0.97 (0.91–1.02) 0.83 (0.74–0.93) 0.96 (0.90–1.01) 0.60 (0.53–0.68)
Mean number of ITNs per household member 0.22 (0.20–0.23) 0.22 (0.22–0.24) 0.21 (0.19–0.24) 0.23 (0.21–0.24) 0.18 (0.16–0.21)
a

95% confidence interval.