Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul;72(1):103–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03947.x

Table 2.

Summary of treatment comparisons

GLS mean ratio (90% CI)
Plasma S/GSK1349572 PK parameter ATV/RTV + S/GSK1349572 vs. S/GSK1349572 (n = 12) ATV + S/GSK1349572 vs. S/GSK1349572 (n = 12)
AUC(0,τ) 1.62 1.91
(1.50, 1.74) (1.80, 2.03)
Cmax 1.34 1.50
(1.25, 1.42) (1.40, 1.59)
Cτ 2.21 2.80
(1.97, 2.47) (2.52, 3.11)
CL/F 0.618 0.523
(0.574, 0.667) (0.494, 0.555)
t1/2 1.81 1.90
(1.64, 1.99) (1.68, 2.14)

ATV, atazanavir; AUC(0,τ), area under the concentration–time curve during a dosing interval; CI, confidence interval; CL/F, apparent oral clearance; Cmax, observed maximal concentration; Cτ, concentration at end of dosing interval at steady state; GLS, geometric least squares; PK, pharmacokinetic; RTV, ritonavir; t1/2, elimination half-life.