Table 2.
Comparison of total mosquitoes collected using the CDC-BP and the Prokopack aspirator in all sampling sites
| Site | Aspiration method | n | N | IRR | Median | IQR | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indoors | |||||||
| Indoor aspiration | CDC - BP | 56 | 701 | 1 | 5 | 2 - 14.5 | - |
| Prokopack | 56 | 658 | 0.93 | 6 | 3 - 15 | 0.735 | |
| Outdoors | |||||||
| Large barrel | CDC | 56 | 114 | 1 | 1 | 0 - 2.5 | - |
| Prokopack | 56 | 101 | 1.04 | 1 | 0 - 2.5 | 0.867 | |
| Car tyre | CDC - BP | 56 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 0 - 1 | - |
| Prokopack | 56 | 31 | 0.78 | 0 | 0 - 1 | 0.418 | |
| Kibanda* | CDC - BP | 48 | 420 | 1 | 4 | 1 - 8.5 | - |
| Prokopack | 45 | 293 | 0.86 | 2 | 0 - 8 | 0.519 |
* fewer replicates of the kibanda were performed due to some roofs being under repair during the collection period
n - number of replicates; N - Total number of collected mosquitoes; IRR - incidence rate ratio; IQR - inter-quartile range.