Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 22;6(7):e22363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022363

Figure 3. Effect of CysLT1 receptor antagonists, montelukast, pranlukast, and zafirlukast, on UDP-evoked ISC responses.

Figure 3

Representative recordings of ISC in response to the apical application of 100 µM UDP (shown by arrows) in the presence of montelukast (A). The CysLT1 receptor antagonist was applied 10 min before the application of UDP (data not shown). Data are summarized for the inhibitory effects of montelukast (B) on the first and second peaks of ISC increases in response to UDP. Similar experiments were performed using pranlukast (C and D) or zafirlukast (E and F). The control was the apical application of UDP alone in the absence of any CysLT1 receptor antagonist. Each column represents the mean ± S.E. (n = 4–5). (*, p<0.05, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test compared with control).