Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 6;35(5):e25–e31. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.01.009

Table 4.

Association between childhood GCT and parental infertility and infertility treatment (Males only)

Controls
n (%)
Cases
n (%)
ORa 95% CI p-value Gonadal
n (%)
ORa 95% CI p-value Non-gonadalb
n (%)
Prior fetal loss
    None 146 (80.7) 70 (84.3) Ref 39 (83.0) Ref 28 (90.3)
    One 26 (14.4) 11 (13.3) 0.71 0.30–1.70 0.44 7 (14.9) 1.06 0.37–3.09 0.91 3 (9.7)
    Two or more 9 (5.0) 2 (2.4) d 1 (2.1) d 0 (0.0)
History of multiple birth prior to index
    None 174 (96.1) 82 (98.8) Ref 46 (97.9) Ref 31 (100.0)
    At least one multiple birth 7 (3.9) 1 (1.2) d 1 (2.1) d 0 (0.0)
Maternal age
    < 27 68 (37.6) 36 (43.4) 1.37 0.70–2.67 0.36 20 (42.6) 1.55 0.66–3.68 0.32 13 (41.9)
    27–34 99 (54.7) 35 (42.2) Ref 20 (42.6) Ref 15 (48.4)
    ≥35 14 (7.7) 12 (14.5) 2.88 1.13–7.37 0.03 7 (14.9) 3.70 1.12–12.24 0.03 3 (9.7)
Use of OSd drugs (prior to or before knowledge of pregnancy)
    No 175 (96.7) 82 (98.8) Ref 46 (97.9) Ref 31 (100.0)
    Yes 6 (3.3) 1 (1.2) d 1 (2.1) d 0 (0.0)
No pregnancy after a year or more of trying
    No 149 (82.8) 66 (79.5) Ref 36 (76.6) Ref 26 (83.9)
    Yes 31 (17.2) 17 (20.5) 1.30 0.61–2.75 0.50 11 (23.4) 1.80 0.70–4.64 0.23 5 (16.1)
Time to index pregnancy
    Not trying 71 (39.4) 40 (48.2) 1.17 0.64–2.14 0.62 18 (38.3) 0.88 0.41–1.90 0.75 18 (58.1)
    < 1 year of trying 88 (48.9) 37 (44.6) Ref 24 (51.1) Ref 12 (38.7)
    ≥ 1 year of trying 21 (11.7) 6 (7.2) 0.56 0.17–1.81 0.33 5 (10.6) 1.09 0.27–4.36 0.90 1 (3.2)
Latent class infertilityb (with maternal age)
    No 167 (92.3) 77 (92.8) Ref 42 (89.4) Ref 31 (100.0)
    Yes 14 (7.7) 6 (7.2) 0.72 0.21–2.48 0.60 5 (10.6) 1.68 0.39–7.29 0.49 0 (0.0)
Latent class infertilityb (without maternal age)
    No 172 (95.0) 82 (98.8) Ref 46 (97.9) Ref 31 (100.0)
    Yes 9 (5.0) 1 (1.2) d 1 (2.1) d 0 (0.0)
a

Logistic regression models were adjusted for child’s age, sex, and gestational age as well as maternal age, race, education, and household income

b

Too few cases of non-gonadal for logistic regression analysis

c

Infertility predicted from the latent class model

d

Sample size too small for logistic regression analysis

e

Ovarian stimulating