Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 25;25(8):2703–2710. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1633-1

Table 1.

Performance of the basic tasks in the laparoscopy, SPA-crossed, and SPA-curved settings

Performance on tasks Run Score Mean (standard deviation) p value
Laparoscopy SPA crossed SPA curved Laparoscopy vs. SPA crossed Laparoscopy vs. SPA curved SPA-crossed vs. SPA curved
1: Translocation 2 Time 130.3 (35.2) 150.7 (41.2) 198.5 (67.6) 0.069 <0.001 0.008
Errors 0.87 (0.83) 0.80 (1.15) 2.33 (1.68) 0.855 0.012 0.004
3 Time 137.7 (34.1) 170.7 (44.3) 0.298a <0.001a 0.005
Errors 1.20 (1.66) 1.60 (1.24) 0.541a 0.102a 0.472
2: Clip & Cut 1 Time 89.6 (24.5)
Errors 0.87 (0.83)
2 Time 102.57 (55.5) 0.398b
Errors 1.73 (2.15) 0.109b
3: Tissue dissection 2 Time 148.1 (39.9) 164.0 (54.7) 165.0 (63.7) 0.240 0.238 0.962
Errors 0.53 (0.74) 1.13 (1.12) 1.27 (0.59) 0.108 0.001 0.685
3 Time 179.5 (85.3) 150.8 (46.9) 0.131a 0.848a 0.309
Errors 1.27 (1.22) 0.93 (1.1) 0.044a 0.111a 0.485

All statistical differences are calculated with the paired t test, a p < 0.05 is considered a significant difference

aStatistical calculated difference between second run of the laparoscopy setting and third run of the SPA setting to account for the unfamiliarity with the SPA setting

bStatistical calculated difference between first run of the laparoscopy setting and second run of the SPA setting to account for the unfamiliarity with the SPA setting