Table 2.
Flax lines | R gene | CH5–89 | Rust strains
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH5–89::siAvrL567 | |||||
T1 | T3 | T4 | |||
Clay | K | + | + | + | + |
Raja | K1 | +(+/−) | + | + | + |
Ottawa | L | −− | −− | −− | −− |
B14 × Burke | L1 | + | + | + | + |
Stewart | L2 | + | + | + | + |
P.B.C. | L3 | + | + | + | + |
Kenya | L4 | − | −(−−) | −(+/−) | −(+/−) |
Wilden | L5 | −− | + | + | + |
Birio | L6 | −− | + | + | + |
Barnes | L7 | +(+/−) | + | + | + |
B13 × Towner | L8 | + | + | + | + |
Bison | L9 | + | + | + | + |
Bolley Golden selection | L10 | + | + | + | + |
Linore | L11 | + | + | + | + |
B6 × Kugler C | L12 | −− | −− | −− | −− |
Lx | Lx | + | + | + | + |
RL10–1 | RL10 | + | + | + | + |
Dakota | M | −− | −− | −− | −− |
Williston Brown | M1 | + | + | + | + |
Ward | M2 | + | + | + | + |
Cass | M3 | −− | −− | −− | −− |
Victory ‘A’ | M4 | −− | −(−−) | −− | − |
Cortland | M5 | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− |
C.I. 2008 | M6 | −− | − | − | − |
Bombay | N | + | + | + | + |
Polk | N1 | −− | −− | −− | −− |
Marshall | N2 | − | −− | −− | −− |
Koto | P | + | + | + | + |
Akmolinsk | P1 | −− | −− | −− | −− |
Abyssinian | P2 | −− | −− | −− | −− |
Leona | P3 | −− | −− | −− | −− |
C.I. 1911 | P4 | + | + | + | + |
Reaction types were scored on a four point scale according to Lawrence et al. (1981), ranging from a fully virulent reaction with many large pustules (+) through restricted growth (+/−) and (−) to no growth (−−). Reaction types intermediate between two scores were scored as −(+/−) or +(+/−) etc.