Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gerontol. 2011;34(2):89–102. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2011.539525

TABLE 1.

Concordance and Discordance of Successful Aging Methods

Concordance between successful aging methods. n %
Concordance: Successful Aging 16 23.9%
Concordance: Nonsuccessful Aging 21 31.3%
Discordance: Self-rated Success, Objective Nonsuccess 26 38.8%
Discordance: Objective Success, Self-rated Nonsuccess 4 6.0%

Note: χ2 (3, N = 67) = 15.93, p = .001.