Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2003 Aug;33(2):60–70. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00100-9

Table 4.

Multivariate Resultsa: Relative Effect of Parental Measures as Predictors of Sexual Activity and Substance Use Among Adolescent Females (n = 347)

Parental Monitoring OR (95% CI) Negotiated Unsupervised Time OR (95% CI) Parental Trust OR (95% CI)
Among all students (n = 347)
 Ever had sex 1.10 (0.74, 1.64) 1.67 (1.25, 2.22)*** 0.56 (0.40, 0.76)***
 Recent sexual activity 0.90 (0.61, 1.32) 1.67 (1.25, 2.22)*** 0.54 (0.39, 0.74)***
 Carry protection 0.96 (0.67, 1.39) 1.39 (1.07, 1.82)* 0.75 (0.56, 1.01)
 Intention to have sex 0.89 (0.60, 1.32) 2.11 (1.55, 2.87)*** 0.47 (0.34, 0.65)***
 Alcohol use 1.02 (0.59, 1.76) 1.58 (1.04, 2.41)* 0.71 (0.46, 1.11)
 Tobacco use 0.85 (0.55, 1.32) 1.18 (0.85, 1.65) 0.67 (0.47, 0.97)*
 Marijuana use 0.67 (0.43, 1.03) 1.66 (1.17, 2.36)** 0.54 (0.37, 0.78)***
Among students reporting sexual activity in the last 4 months (n = 125)
 Consistent condom use 1.04 (0.54, 1.98) 0.77 (0.47, 1.24) 1.51 (0.88, 2.62)
Among students who report to have “ever” had sex (n = 175)
 Had STD 1.01 (0.52, 1.97) 1.43 (0.89, 2.29) 0.69 (0.40, 1.18)
 No condom, no sex 0.98 (0.56, 1.71) 1.78 (1.16, 2.73)** 0.81 (0.51, 1.28)
*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.

a

All models are adjusted for age, race, intervention status, proportion of days in curriculum, and neighborhood socioeconomic status (percent of households living in poverty.

STD = sexually transmitted disease.