Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 7;105(2):304–311. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.219

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses for survival.

  Cox univariate
Cox multivariate
  N a Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value N a Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value
A: IPC set, PFS analysis
 Age (years) 35 1.02 0.98–1.05 0.36        
 Grade 3 (vs 1+2) 34 1.42 0.59–3.43 0.43        
 FIGO stage (IV vs others) 35 22.9 5.16–101 3.80E-05 34 8.34 1.93–36.1 4.60E-03
 Taxane without (vs with) 35 1.83 0.82–4.07 0.14        
 Non-optimal surgery (vs optimal) 34 3.35 1.34–8.38 9.80E-03 34 2.36 0.89–6.26 0.09
 OPM Unfavourable (vs Favourable) 35 14.3 3.87–53.1 6.80E-05 34 8.59 2.17–34.0 2.20E-03
                 
B: Validation set, OS analysis
 Age (years) 191 1.01 0.99–1.04 0.23        
 Grade 3 (vs 1+2) 260 1.01 0.69–1.50 9.50E-01        
 FIGO stage (IV vs III) 262 2.87 1.73–4.77 4.71E-05 236 2.60 1.48–4.60 9.60E-04
 Residual disease (present vs absent) 235 1.59 1.07–2.35 2.2E-02 236 1.47 0.97–2.22 0.07
 OPM Unfavourable (vs Favourable) 262 2.42 1.6–3.66 2.72E-05 236 2.56 1.62–4.03 5.40E-05

Abbreviations: 95% CI=95% confidence interval; FIGO=Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et Obstétrique; OPM=optimal prognostic model; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival.

a

Number of patients with data available. Signficant P-values were highlighted with bold characters.