Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 12;105(2):206–211. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.227

Table 3. Capecitabine-specific skin toxicity – survival data.

  Grade 0, n=101 (78.5%) Grade 1, n=16 (10.7%) Grade 2, n=22 (14.8%) Grade 3, n=10 (6.7%) P-value logrank a Hazard ratio (95% CI)
(A) Capecitabine-related skin toxicities
Progression-free survival (PFS) (in months) 95% CI 5.6 (4.8–6.3) 8.5 (5.0–11.9) 8.9 (7.1–10.6) 13.6 (10.4–16.9) 0.002 0.72 (0.60–0.86)
Overall survival (OS) (in months) 95% CI 22.4 (17.6–27.2) 30.5 (27.0–33.9) 33.1 (20.8–45.5) 37.5 (24.4–46.0)b 0.053 0.74 (0.60–0.92)
         
  Grade 0, n=101 (67.8%) c
Grade 1–3, n=48 (33.2%) c P-value logrank
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
(B) Capecitabine-related skin toxicities, n=149
Progression-free survival (PFS) (in months) 95% CI 5.6 (4.8–6.3) 9.9 (8.2–11.6) <0.001 0.51 (0.36–0.72)
Overall survival (OS) in months 95% CI 22.4 (17.6–27.2) 32.8 (22.9–42.3) 0.008 0.56 (0.36–0.86)
         
  Grade 0, n=58 (74.4%) c
Grade 1-3, n=20 (25.6%) c P-value logrank
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
(C) Capecitabine-related skin toxicities, Arm A (CAIPIRI), n=78
Progression-free survival (PFS) in months, 95% CI 5.2 (4.5–5.9) 8.5 (5.3–11.7) 0.011 0.52 (0.31–0.87)
Overall survival (OS) in months, 95% CI 19.7 (11.9–27.5) 32.0 (25.5–38.5) 0.125 0.63 (0.35–1.14)
         
  Grade 0, n=43 (60.6%) c
Grade 1-3, n=28 (39.4%) c P-value logrank
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
(D) Capecitabine-related skin toxicities, Arm B (CAPOX), n=71
Progression-free survival (PFS) (in months) 95% CI 6.5 (4.7–8.4) 9.9 (8.3–11.5) 0.004 0.48 (0.29–0.80)
Overall survival (OS) (in months) 95% CI 24.0 (11.9–36.1) 37.5 (30.8–46.4)b 0.056 0.54 (0.29–1.03)

Abbreviation: CI=confidence interval.

a

Logrank for differences of all grades.

b

95% CI of mean as 50% of patients are censored for s.d. of median.

c

According to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria of Adverse Events, version 3.0. The bold value in (A) indicates statistically significant (0.002; P<0.05); in (B) indicates statistically highly significant (<0.001) and statistically significant (0.008; P<0.05); in (C) and (D) indicate statistically significant (0.011 in (C) and 0.004 in (D); P<0.05).