Table A4.
The day–maze model yielded the smallest AIC, but the effect of day was not reliable for its coefficient.
| Models | AIC | Estimated coefficients of variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| γ0 (Intercept) | γ1 (Day) | γ2 (Maze) | γ3 (Feeder) | |||
| 1 | [γ0, γ1, γ2] | 14088 | 1.54956 | (0.04025) | −1.29326 | – |
| 2 | [γ0, γ2] | 14089 | 1.5501 | – | −1.2934 | – |
| 3 | [γ0, γ1, γ2, γ3] | 14089 | 1.42322 | (0.04025) | −1.16667 | (0.27757) |
| 4 | [γ0, γ2, γ3] | 14090 | 1.4236 | – | −1.1667 | (0.2782) |
| 5 | [γ0, γ3] | 14105 | 0.6943 | – | – | 1.0073 |
| 6 | [γ0, γ1, γ3] | 14105 | 0.69392 | (0.04026) | – | 1.00706 |
| 7 | [γ0, γ1] | 14110 | 0.93383 | (0.04022) | – | – |
| 8 | [γ0] | 14111 | 0.9340 | – | – | – |
AICs for synchrony index (Experiment 2). AICs and estimated coefficients of variables were calculated for 8 models designed for synchrony index in Experiment 2. The model [γ0, γ1, γ2] indicates that day had insignificant effects.
Opaque wall: X = 0.2567 + (0.04025 + ris) × day + rii.
Transparent wall: X = 1.5501 + (0.04025 + ris) × day + rii.