Table A8.
The maze model yielded the smallest AIC.
| Models | AIC | Estimated coefficients of variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ0 (Intercept) | δ1 (Maze) | δ2 (Feeder) | δ3 (Maze:feeder) | |||
| 1 | [δ0, δ1] | 77.45 | 3.65249 | −0.45497 | – | – |
| 2 | [δ0, δ1, δ2] | 77.58 | 3.70838 | −0.45496 | (−0.01875) | – |
| 3 | [δ0, δ1, δ2, δ3] | 78.84 | 3.73782 | −0.52555 | (−0.02872) | (0.02379) |
| 4 | [δ0] | 93.85 | 3.41092 | – | – | – |
| 5 | [δ0, δ2] | 93.98 | 3.46683 | – | (−0.01875) | – |
AICs for velocity (Experiment 3). AICs and estimated coefficients of variables were calculated for 5 models designed for running velocity in Experiment 3. The model [δ0, δ1] indicates that only maze had significant effects.
Single: X = 3.19752 + ris × feeder + rii.
Paired: X = 3.65249 + ris × feeder + rii.