Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 1;108(2):367–380. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr141

Table 5.

Best-fitting models and parameter values for separate (petA-psbJ, trnT-trnL, trnT-trnE, psbD-trnT) and combined datasets in this study

Base frequencies
Substitution model (rate matrix)
Region AIC selected model A C G T A–C A–G A–T C–G C–T G–T I* G*
petA-psbJ TIM 0·3623 0·1419 0·1185 0·3773 1·0000 0·8642 0·2735 0·2735 0·5067 1·0000 0 Equal
trnT-trnL TIM + G 0·4190 0·0884 0·1238 0·3688 1·0000 0·0865 0·0596 0·0596 0·2375 1·0000 0 0·3479
trnT-trnE TVM + G 0·3709 0·1337 0·1260 0·3695 1·0000 0·5281 0·2382 0·8342 0·5281 1·0000 0 0·6412
psbD-trnT K81uf + I + G 0·3510 0·1391 0·1247 0·3853 1·0000 0·3110 0·1832 0·1832 0·3110 1·0000 0·5654 0·9177
Combined analyses TVM + I + G 0·3731 0·1240 0·1254 0·3775 1·1519 0·3672 0·1489 0·4059 0·3672 1·0000 0·3310 0·8910

* I, Proportion of invariable sites; G, gamma distribution.