Table 1.
Assayed under optimal conditions for each catalytic entity | [NH4+]; [Mg2+], M | kobs (WT), min−1* | Rel. kobs (WT) | kobs (MT), min−1** | Rel. kobs (MT) | kobs(WT)/kobs(MT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pre-tRNATyr-Mja RPR (WT or ΔU MT) | 2.5; 0.5 | 0.2 ± 0.04 | 1 | 0.0025 ± 0.0002 | 1 | 80 |
+ RPP21•RPP29 | 0.8; 0.1 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 1 | 0.017 ± 0.0014 | 7 | 14 |
+ POP5•RPP30 | 0.8; 0.1 | 20 ± 0.32 | 100 | 1.46 ± 0.12 | 584 | 14 |
+ Both binary RPP complexes | 0.8; 0.1 | 22 ± 0.16 | 105 | 1.84 ± 0.18* | 736 | 12 |
These rates at pH 6 were extrapolated from those determined at pH 5.4 and reported by us previously.16 We had also earlier established the direct relationship between log (kobs) versus pH.16
Experiments were performed at pH 6, except for pre-tRNATyr-Mja ΔU RPR reconstituted with both binary RPP complexes, which was assayed at pH 5.4. The rate at pH 6 for the reaction with four RPPs was obtained by extrapolation from 5.4. The standard errors of the curve fits shown in Figure 3 are indicated in the estimates of kobs.