Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2011 Jun 12;411(2):368–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.05.012

Table 1.

Effect of Mja RPPs on the rate of cleavage of pre-tRNATyr-Mja (WT) and -Mja ΔU (MT) at 55°C

Assayed under optimal conditions for each catalytic entity [NH4+]; [Mg2+], M kobs (WT), min−1* Rel. kobs (WT) kobs (MT), min−1** Rel. kobs (MT) kobs(WT)/kobs(MT)

pre-tRNATyr-Mja RPR (WT or ΔU MT) 2.5; 0.5 0.2 ± 0.04 1 0.0025 ± 0.0002 1 80
+ RPP21•RPP29 0.8; 0.1 0.24 ± 0.04 1 0.017 ± 0.0014 7 14
+ POP5•RPP30 0.8; 0.1 20 ± 0.32 100 1.46 ± 0.12 584 14
+ Both binary RPP complexes 0.8; 0.1 22 ± 0.16 105 1.84 ± 0.18* 736 12
*

These rates at pH 6 were extrapolated from those determined at pH 5.4 and reported by us previously.16 We had also earlier established the direct relationship between log (kobs) versus pH.16

**

Experiments were performed at pH 6, except for pre-tRNATyr-Mja ΔU RPR reconstituted with both binary RPP complexes, which was assayed at pH 5.4. The rate at pH 6 for the reaction with four RPPs was obtained by extrapolation from 5.4. The standard errors of the curve fits shown in Figure 3 are indicated in the estimates of kobs.