Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Nov 25;22(3):223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.07.007

Table 5.

Logistic regression analysis* with high CRP+ as the dependent variable and dietary patterns as the independent variables

OR1 (95% CI) P trend OR2 (95% CI) P trend
Vegetable-based
pattern
0.39 0.94
Quintile 1 1.00 1.00
Quintile 2 1.01 0.71-1.44 0.94 0.66-1.35
Quintile 3 1.29 0.92-1.82 1.11 0.78-1.57
Quintile 4 1.08 0.76-1.55 0.98 0.68-1.41
Quintile 5 1.16 0.81-1.66 0.97 0.67-1.40
Fruit-based
pattern
Quintile 1 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.04
Quintile 2 0.71 0.51-0.99 0.72 0.51-1.01
Quintile 3 0.69 0.49-0.97 0.70 0.50-1.00
Quintile 4 0.66 0.47-0.94 0.66 0.46-0.95
Quintile 5 0.67 0.46-0.97 0.68 0.46-0.99
Meat-based
pattern
Quintile 1 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.06
Quintile 2 0.88 0.62-1.25 0.93 0.65-1.34
Quintile 3 0.94 0.66-1.35 0.98 0.68-1.42
Quintile 4 1.23 0.86-1.75 1.25 0.87-1.80
Quintile 5 1.30 0.89-1.91 1.34 0.91-1.99
+

The reference category is <=3mg/L

OR1 Adjusted for age, kcal/day, education, income, occupation, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, tea consumption, CVD, and assay batch.

OR2 As above plus BMI