Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2011 Feb 11;49(2):180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.11.244

Table 2.

Effects of Adolescent Substance Use on the Relationship between Positive Childhood Experiences and Positive Adult Functioning within Each Domain

Model: Domain of positive functioning Model path coefficients a (95% confidence interval)
Model fit b
Step 1
Step 2
χ2(df) CFI RMSEA
Childhood experiences → Adult functioning (w/o adol. sub. use) Childhood experiences → Adult functioning (w/adol. sub. use) Childhood experiences → Adolescent sub. use. Adolescent sub. use → Adult functioning
Civic involvement .47*** (.30 to .63) .41*** (.23 to .58) −.20* (−.36 to −.05) −.23* (−.41 to −.06) 32.59 (24) .982 .029
Productivity and responsibility .35* (.18 to .51) .26* (.09 to .44) −.26** (−.42 to −.11) −.35* (−.53 to −.17) 70.50***(24) .900 .067
Interpersonal connection .55* (.31 to .78) .55* (.24 to .85) −.49*** (−.65 to −.33) −.03 (−.32 to .26) 45.54** (23) .940 .048
Physical exercise .22*** (.11 to .32) .20*** (.09 to .30) −.16* (−.28 to −.03) −.12 (−.26 to .02) 6.75 (4) .987 .040

Note. adol. = adolescent; sub. = substance.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.

a

Entries are standardized path coefficients with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses.

b

Model fit indices are based on the final models including adolescent substance use. N = 429 for all models.