Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Nov;21(11):2245–2262. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21151

Table 2.

Results of pretest ratings for the sentence-pairs and their critical words. Differences among means were not significant (all ps>.1) except for those marked with an *(ps<.05, see text)

Positive mean (SD) Negative mean (SD) Neutral mean (SD)

Affect of the sentence pair* 5.73 (0.4) 2.11 (0.5) 4.21 (0.5)
Affect of the critical word* 5.43 (0.8) 2.19 (0.7) 4.30 (0.7)
Arousal of the critical word* 4.26 (1.1) 4.64 (0.9) 3.37 (0.9)
Concreteness of the critical word 3.76 (1.3) 3.85 (1.1) 4.03 (1.1)
Cloze probability percentage* 3.52 (7.93) 1.42 (5.12) 1.14 (4.21)
Plausibility* 5.82 (1.56) 4.72 (1.55) 5.63 (1.12)
Number of letters in the critical word 7.30 (2.4) 6.76 (2.3) 7.27 (2.2)
K-F Frequency of the critical word 46.55 (101. 4) 38.42 (99.6) 54.44 (57.4)