Table 4. Isokinetic concentric knee flexor peak torque percentage strength deficit (involved/non-involved limb) and effect size for graft type comparison.
Angular velocity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author | 60° s−1 | 180° s−1 | 240° s−1 | 300° s−1 | ||
Adachi et al. (2003)4 | 2ST-2G | 95.9% | 109.1% | |||
4ST | 98.3% | 101.9% | ||||
Effect size (d) | 0.20 | 0.31 | ||||
Carter & Edinger (1999)16 | 2ST-2G | 81.7% | 75.6% | |||
4ST | 80.6% | 79.1% | ||||
Effect size (d) | 0.05 | 0.15 | ||||
Lipscomb et al. (1982)13 | 2ST-2G | 97.5% | 101.3% | |||
4ST | 103.5% | 100.5% | ||||
Nakamura et al. (2002)9 | 2ST-2G | 91.3% | 86.1% | |||
4ST | 93.7% | 89.4% | ||||
Effect size (d) | 0.17 | 0.21 | ||||
Segawa et al. (2002)7 | 2ST-2G | 93.6% | ||||
4ST | 93.9% | |||||
Effect size (d) | 0.26 | |||||
Tashiro et al. (2003)12 | 2ST-2G | 90% | 90% | |||
4ST | 93% | 95% |