Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Cogn Psychol. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):528–535. doi: 10.1002/acp.1725

Table 2.

Correlations among SAT, V-SAT, Q-SAT, measures of higher-level processes, working memory, epistemic belief, academic self efficacy, academic locus of control, test anxiety, performance-approach goals and performance-avoidance goals (n = 253)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1. SAT .89 .88 .35 .37 .32 .45 .29 .24 −.10 .47 −.40 .24 .06 −.41 −.04 −.39
2. V-SAT .58 .36 .34 .33 .42 .34 .27 −.15 .47 −.42 .23 .11 −.40 −.07 −.36
3. Q-SAT .27 .32 .23 .37 .16 .15 −.02 .35 −.28 .20 −.01 −.33 −.00 −.34
4. Text memory .73 .68 .68 .44 .21 .09 .36 −.23 .12 .22 −.24 −.11 −.23
5. Text inferencing .54 .60 .35 .13 −.13 .37 −.15 .09 .15 −.24 −.12 −.26
6. Low-knowledge integration .65 .43 .15 −.05 .29 −.19 .10 .15 −.21 −.09 −.18
7. High-knowledge integration .42 .28 .02 .33 −.23 .18 .18 −.30 −.10 −.31
8. Low-knowledge access .38 −.04 .16 −.20 .15 .13 −.28 −.02 −.23
9. High-knowledge access −.07 .12 −.04 .10 .08 −.19 −.03 −.21
10. Speed −.08 .03 .02 .08 −.00 .02 .04
11. Composite working memory −.30 .12 −.07 .20 −.03 −.20
12. Epistemic belief of learning .21 .01 −.25 .11 −.32
13. Academic self efficacy .47 −.50 .16 −.28
14. Academic locus of control −.29 .08 −.15
15. Test anxiety .22 .58
16. Performance-approach goals .26
17. Performance-avoidance goals

Note: For r <.13, p >.05.