Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2011 May 31;123(24):2811–2818. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009928

Table 5.

The adjusted risk of the composite cardiovascular endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death according to the presence of a detectable hsTnT in women with and without diabetes in the Women’s Health Study.

Diabetic Women* Non-Diabetic Women
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P-value
Model 1 1.95 (1.17-3.23) 0.010 1.07 (0.81-1.40) 0.63
Model 2 1.85 (1.09-3.17) 0.024 1.13 (0.82-1.54) 0.45
Model 3 1.79 (1.04-3.07) 0.036 1.13 (0.82-1.55) 0.46
Model 4 1.76 (1.00-3.08) 0.0499 1.15 (0.82-1.59) 0.42
*

65 out of 512 diabetic women developed the composite cardiovascular endpoint during follow up.

The case-cohort study of non-diabetic women included 479 cases of the composite cardiovascular endpoint and a reference subcohort of 564 women.

Model 1: Age, race adjusted

Model 2: Age, race, body mass index (kg/m2), history of hypertension, current smoking, parental history of myocardial infarction, total cholesterol (mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL), natural logarithm high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L).

Model 3: Model 2 plus hemoglobin A1c (%)

Model 4: Model 2 plus hemoglobin A1c (%) and the natural logarithms of NT-proBNP and estimated glomerular filtration rate.