Table 5.
Diabetic Women* | Non-Diabetic Women† | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
Model 1 | 1.95 (1.17-3.23) | 0.010 | 1.07 (0.81-1.40) | 0.63 |
Model 2 | 1.85 (1.09-3.17) | 0.024 | 1.13 (0.82-1.54) | 0.45 |
Model 3 | 1.79 (1.04-3.07) | 0.036 | 1.13 (0.82-1.55) | 0.46 |
Model 4 | 1.76 (1.00-3.08) | 0.0499 | 1.15 (0.82-1.59) | 0.42 |
65 out of 512 diabetic women developed the composite cardiovascular endpoint during follow up.
The case-cohort study of non-diabetic women included 479 cases of the composite cardiovascular endpoint and a reference subcohort of 564 women.
Model 1: Age, race adjusted
Model 2: Age, race, body mass index (kg/m2), history of hypertension, current smoking, parental history of myocardial infarction, total cholesterol (mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL), natural logarithm high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L).
Model 3: Model 2 plus hemoglobin A1c (%)
Model 4: Model 2 plus hemoglobin A1c (%) and the natural logarithms of NT-proBNP and estimated glomerular filtration rate.