Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Dec 11;99(24):1854–1863. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm238

Table 1.

Characteristics of 123 radiologists included in the study

Radiologist characteristic No. (%) of radiologists No. (%) of diagnostic mammograms
With cancer Without cancer
Demographics
 Radiologist's age, y
  34–44 39 (31.7) 381 (26.8) 8813 (25.6)
  45–54 47 (38.2) 690 (48.5) 16 202 (47.0)
  ≥55 37 (30.1) 353 (24.8) 9456 (27.4)
 Radiologist's sex
  Male 96 (78.0) 1014 (71.2) 25 602 (74.3)
  Female 27 (22.0) 410 (28.8) 8869 (25.7)
Experience
 In mammography interpretation, y
  <10 29 (23.6) 190 (13.3) 4678 (13.6)
  10–19 57 (46.3) 877 (61.6) 19 944 (57.9)
  ≥20 37 (30.1) 357 (25.1) 9849 (28.6)
 Fellowship training in breast imaging
  No 119 (96.7) 1398 (98.2) 33 862 (98.2)
  Yes 4 (3.3) 26 (1.8) 609 (1.8)
 % of time working in breast imaging
  <20 55 (44.7) 417 (29.3) 11 531 (33.5)
  20–39 52 (42.3) 818 (57.4) 18 816 (54.6)
  ≥40 16 (13.0) 189 (13.3) 4124 (12.0)
 No. of mammograms interpreted in prior year
  500–1000 32 (26.0) 171 (12.0) 4320 (12.5)
  1001–2000 46 (37.4) 529 (37.1) 12 008 (34.8)
  >2000 45 (36.6) 724 (50.8) 18 143 (52.6)
Practice characteristics
 Primary affiliation with an academic medical center
  No 116 (94.3) 1373 (96.4) 33 377 (96.8)
  Yes 7 (5.7) 51 (3.6) 1094 (3.2)
 % of mammograms interpreted that were diagnostic
  0–24 61 (49.6) 679 (47.7) 17 145 (49.7)
  25–49 53 (43.1) 667 (46.8) 15 052 (43.7)
  50–100 9 (7.3) 78 (5.5) 2274 (6.6)
 Performed breast biopsy examination in prior year
  No 33 (26.8) 258 (18.1) 7101 (20.6)
  Yes 90 (73.2) 1166 (81.9) 27 370 (79.4)