Table 3.
Composition of the treatment loads.
| Food Item | Water (g) | Fibera (g) | Cheeseb (g) | Potatoc (g) | Peanutd (g) | Energy (kJ [kcal]) | Fat (%) | Protein (%) | CHOe (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peanut | 400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 1255.2 [300] | 70 | 16 | 14 |
| Snack mix | 400 | 7 | 39 | 15 | 0 | 1263.6 [302] | 63 | 19 | 18 |
| Snack mix w/peanuts | 400 | 4 | 20 | 8 | 26 | 1330.5 [318] | 66 | 18 | 16 |
| Controlf | 400 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1251.2 [299] | 34 | 16 | 50 |
aFiber one cereal, general mills, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
bJust the cheese-crunchy baked cheese snack, specialty cheese Co., Lowell, WI, USA.
cPotato sticks.
dDry roasted, lightly salted.
eCarbohydrate.
fThe control treatment load was of identical composition to the standard study lunch (Table 2), but adjusted proportionally to provide equal-energy to the other treatment loads.