Table 1. Highest and lowest ranking countries for investment in Single Site Threatened Species prioritized against different criteria.
Most species | Cheapest | Most honest | Best value | Best value including species no. |
Mexico | Ethiopia | New Zealand | Ethiopia | Mexico |
Colombia | Pakistan | Canada | Pakistan | Colombia |
Peru | Guinea | Australia | Guinea | Brazil |
Indonesia | Kyrgyzstan | Gough, Inaccessible, Henderson Is. (UK) | Sao Tome and Principe | Australia |
Brazil | Sao Tome and Principe | Amsterdam I. (France) | Kyrgyzstan | United States of America |
Cuba | Iran | Chile | Vietnam | Peru |
China | Vietnam | Bermuda | Iran | Indonesia |
Ecuador | Uganda | Japan | India | Japan |
United States of America | India | St Lucia | Ghana | China |
Madagascar | Ghana | United States of America | Uganda | New Zealand |
Ranks are best to worst in top section, worst to best in lower section. Best value including species number sorts the countries with the most and least SSTS taking account of PPP and CI.