Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 27;4:119. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-119

Table 1.

Numbers of Culicoides collected over 12 nights using four trapping methods

Species1 Total No. Rank species No. Culicoides collected with
Drop trap2 Direct aspiration Sticky cover trap UV-light/suction trap
F M No. F Parity No. E No. M No. F Parity No. E No. F Parity No. E No. G No. F Parity No. E No. G No. M
C. brunnicans 313 6 1 153 0.48 49 4 36 0.69 1 69 0.39 7 55 0.67 2

C. obsoletus 75 2 22 0.86 15 14 0.43 3 39 0.54

C. dewulfi 46 1 3 27 0.44 14 0.43 1 1.00 4 0.25 1

C. scoticus 27 4 8 0.13 1 5 0.40 4 0.25 10 0.00

C. punctatus 16 5 2 0.50 3 1.00 1 11 0.55

C. vexans 15 6 9 0.89 3 2 1.00 3 1.00 2 1 1.00

C. achrayi 10 7 2 0.50 1 1 0 7 0.57 1 2

C. chiopterus 6 8 2 0.00 2 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00

C. subfasciipennis 5 9 5 0.80 1

C. pulicaris 2 1 10 2 0.50 1

C. picturatus 1 11 1 1.00

C. circumscriptus 1 11 1 1.00

C. santonicus 1 11 1 1.00

C. shaklawensis 1 11 1 1.00 1

C. simulator 1 11 1 1.00 1

C. lupicaris 1 11 1 0.00

C. clastrieri 1 11 1

Obsoletus Complex 2 11 1 1.00 1 0.00

Culicoides sp. 2 1 0.00 1 0.00

Total 525 9 232 70 4 74 4 83 2 8 136 1 4 5

1 For the sake of clarity, 0 were not quoted.

2 F: females; M: males; E: engorged; G: gravide. Parity rate is No. parous/No. females.