Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 28;7(7):e1002104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002104

Table 1. Evidence for decelerating waves in WNV in NYC for 2000–2008.

Year Birds Mosquito Combined
ρ p-value ρ p-value ρ p-value
Convex hull 2000 −0.44 3.63×10−8 −0.236 0.0196 −0.461 9.16×10−9
2001 −0.11 0.141 −0.225 0.0125 −0.260 3.98×10−3
2002 −0.245 0.00353 −0.187 0.0353 −0.331 1.02×10−4
2003 −0.374 5.93×10−5 −0.385 1.51×10−4 −0.497 4.66×10−8
2004 −0.188 0.0397 −0.193 0.0238 −0.175 0.0336
2005 −0.0033 0.486 −0.254 0.015 −0.123 0.103
2006 −0.299 0.00596 −0.24 0.0101 −0.286 2.76×10−3
2007 −0.125 0.119 −0.314 1.79×10−3 −0.371 1.94×10−4
2008 −0.145 0.0713
Maximum distance 2000 −0.234 0.00316 −0.129 0.131 −0.26 0.00114
2001 −0.174 0.0437 −0.259 0.00484 −0.331 0.000314
2002 −0.173 0.0296 −0.2085 0.0219 −0.231 0.00535
2003 −0.26 0.0044 −0.254 0.00988 −0.24155 0.006985
2004 −0.188 0.04 −0.149 0.064 −0.171 0.0368
2005 −0.0292 0.382 −0.0975 0.206 −0.04 0.3385
2006 −0.281 0.0198 −0.2125 0.02 −0.2125 0.0204
2007 −0.197 0.031 −0.147 0.09 −0.07575 0.238
2008 −0.16 0.052
Boundary displacement 2000 −0.374 4.7×10−6 −0.317 0.00447 −0.401 8.39×10−7
2001 −0.325 0.00197 −0.25 0.00699 −0.217 0.0163
2002 −0.424 5.59×10−6 −0.297 0.00374 −0.441 9.73×10−7
2003 −0.465 1.74×10−6 −0.336 0.001 −0.468 4.05×10−7
2004 −0.174 0.0662 −0.3095 0.0015 −0.309 0.0012
2005 −0.191 0.0442 −0.315 0.00503 −0.266 0.00607
2006 −0.156 0.111 −0.218 0.0191 −0.269 0.005
2007 −0.2435 0.0244 −0.416 8.325×10−5 −0.4415 1.31×10−5
2008 −0.272 0.0059

P-values obtained from one-tailed hypothesis tests of Spearman's rank-order correlation between estimated wave speed and time elapsed. The extent of the infected area was estimated using three alternative methods: the convex hull encompassing all previous locations where WNV was detected, the average length of transects originating from the epicentre where they intersect these convex hulls, and the maximum Euclidean distance from the initial infected location (see Materials and Methods for details). The wave speed of WNV was calculated by dividing the increase of the extent of the infected area by the time elapsed since the last increase in the extent, for WNV-positive dead birds, WNV-positive mosquito pools, or the combination of both WNV-positive dead birds and mosquito pools. Values in bold italic are significant at the Holm-Bonferroni corrected level, while regular bold figures are significant at the nominal α = 0.05 level. The combined analysis, providing the greatest statistical power, provides evidence at the Holm-Bonferroni corrected level for a decelerating wave in 7 out of the 8 years studied, and for all years at the α = 0.05 level.