Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 29;384(2):169–176. doi: 10.1007/s00210-011-0662-6

Table 2.

Relative binding specificities of cyclic nucleotide analogs measured with various cGMP and cAMP immunoassays as described under “Methods” section

Analog Specificity ENZO cAMP-EIA Specificity IBL cAMP-RIA Specificity ENZO cGMP-EIA Specificity IBL cGMP-RIA Specificity Cayman cGMP-EIA
cAMP 1.00 1.00
cGMP 1.00 1.00 1.00
2′-dcGMP 0.052
Rp-cGMPS 0.0027 0.10
2′-dcAMP 0.034
8-Br-cGMP (15) 4.90 0.20 0.005
Rp-cAMPS (7) 0.68 0.67
8-Br-cAMP (4) 0.004 0.026
Rp-8-Br-cAMPS (12) 0.003
6-MB-cAMP (1) 0.004 0.012
6-Bnz-cAMP (2) 0.006 0.009
8-pCPT-cGMP (16) 2.40 0.30 0.0008
8-pCPT-cAMP (5) 0.0005
8-Br-PET-cGMP (22) 0.10 0.015 0.016
Rp-8-Br-PET-cGMPS (23) 0.002 0.011
8-pCPT-2′-OMe-cAMP (10) 0.0003 0.0066 0.0002 <10−4
Sp-5,6-DCl-cBIMPS (11) <10−4 0.005
IBMX (26) <10−5 <10−4 <10−6 <10−6 <10−5

The analogs are ordered according to their lipophilicity (see Table 4). Specificity is expressed as EC50cGMP or cAMP/EC50Analog. The absolute EC50 binding constants for acetylated cAMP in [M] are 7.62 × 10−10 (ENZO) and 5.8 × 10−9 (IBL); for acetylated cGMP in [M]: 2.27 × 10−10 (ENZO), 1.8 × 10−9 (IBL) and 3.9 × 10−10 (Cayman)