Skip to main content
. 2011 May 2;20(14):2889–2896. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr191

Table 2.

Association of MICA/HCP5 deletion and NPC in an independent set of case–control samples

Characteristica Discovery phase
P-valueb Validation phase
P-valueb Combined
P-valueb Odds ratio (95% CI)
Controls (n = 276) NPC patients (n = 275) Controls (n = 458) NPC patients (n = 428) Controls (n = 734) NPC patients (n = 703)
With deletion 0 (0%) 11 (4%) 4.32E–04 5 (1.1%) 13 (3%) 0.0548 5 (0.7%) 24 (3.4%) 2.27E–04 5.15 (1.96–13.58)
Without deletion 276 (100%) 264 (96%) 453 (98.9%) 415 (97%) 729 (99.3%) 679 (96.6%)
Male 183 207 0.0081 316 312 0.003 499 519 3.65E–05 18.92 (2.52–141.91)
With deletion 0 (0%) 8 (3.9%) 1 (0.3%) 11 (3.5%) 1 (0.2%) 19 (3.7%)
Without deletion 183 (100%) 199 (96.1%) 315 (99.7%) 301 (96.5%) 498 (99.8%) 500 (96.3%)
Female 93 68 0.0734 142 116 0.694 235 184 0.514 1.61 (0.43–6.09)
With deletion 0 (0%) 3 (4.4%) 4 (2.8%) 2 (1.7%) 4 (1.7%) 5 (2.7%)
Without deletion 93 (100%) 65 (95.6%) 138 (97.2%) 114 (98.3%) 231 (98.3%) 179 (97.3%)

a‘Deletion’ means the MICA/HCP5 deletion (CN = 1) in this case.

bStatistical significance was determined using Fisher's exact test; values of P < 0.05 are shown in bold.