Table 2.

ANOVA of P200, N400, and the LPC amplitudes measured at 100 ms intervals during the 500- to 1000-ms period.

Time window (ms)	Condition main effects F(2, 30)	Condition × Caudality Interaction effects F(4, 60)	M ± SE (amplitudes, μV)			Post hoc test
			Physical representation	Reading the single mind	Reading the interactive mind
P200	1.954	1.372	5.61 ± 0.47	6.21 ± 0.57	6.30 ± 0.49	1–2, 2–3, 1–3
N400	1.232	1.455	−1.59 ± 0.58	−1.29 ± 0.54	−1.14 ± 0.51	1–2, 2–3, 1–3
500–600	3.193	7.861**	0.60 ± 0.64	1.71 ± 0.77	2.17 ± 0.75	1–2*, 2–3, 1–3**
600–700	5.035*	6.546**	1.58 ± 0.62	2.74 ± 0.71	2.96 ± 0.59	1–2, 2–3, 1–3*
700–800	2.847	13.45*	1.44 ± 0.56	1.90 ± 0.64	2.67 ± 0.56	1–2, 2–3, 1–3*
800–900	1.13	2.122	1.14 ± 0.42	1.31 ± 0.56	1.71 ± 0.44	1–2, 2–3, 1–3
900–1000	0.955	1.556	0.87 ± 0.40	1.00 ± 0.53	1.39 ± 0.40	1–2, 2–3, 1–3

In the post hoc test, the number 1 physical representation, 2 reading the single mind, and 3 reading the interactive mind. (***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05).