Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2010 Feb 10;10(4):802–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03020.x

Table 3.

(A) Proportion of registrants eventually undergoing transplantation. Deceased donor (DD) includes both SCD and ECD kidneys. (B) Relative risk (shown as Hazard Ratio) of death from time of listing, comparing those who were ECD-willing with those who were not. Note that, since this is an intention-to-treat design, some from each group might have received ECD kidneys, SCD kidneys, LD kidneys, or no kidneys at all.

(A)

Cohort % LD transplant % DD transplant % ECD transplant
All registrants
    Non-ECD willing 8.15 21.13 0.23
      ECD-willing 5.80 27.04 9.51
ECD-benefit
    Non-ECD willing 6.87 14.44 0.22
      ECD-willing 5.00 22.17 9.23
Non-ECD-benefit
    Non-ECD willing 9.36 27.45 0.24
      ECD-willing 6.95 34.10 9.91
Age ≥ 65
    Non-ECD willing 5.22 16.71 0.52
      ECD-willing 3.72 28.18 13.56
(B)

Subgroup HR (95% CI) for ECD-willing p-Value
ECD-benefit 0.88 (0.85–0.91) <0.001
Non-ECD benefit 1.11 (1.05–1.18) <0.001
Age ≥ 65 0.89 (0.83–0.94) <0.001