Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 17;95(18):1384–1393. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg048

Table 3.

Possible explanations for the variability noted among published studies of screening mammography

Characteristics of the population screened
   • Age (e.g., percentage of women <50 years of age)
   • Initial versus subsequent screening examination
   • Presence of risk factors for breast cancer
   • Presence of breast symptoms
   • Self-referral versus physician referral
Features of the mammography examination
   • Equipment type and year
   • One or two views of each breast
   • Single or double readings
   • Technician training
Features of physicians interpreting the mammogram
   • Experience of the physician
   • Level of personal comfort with ambiguity
   • Individual thresholds to label film as abnormal
Features of the health care system
   • Malpractice concerns
   • Financial incentives
   • Private versus academic/public programs
   • Different stated goals for the percentage of mammograms judged
     abnormal and positive predictive value
   • Quality control and auditing procedures
   • Variability of definitions used to calculate outcomes